Cited by 10Management and Organizational PracticesAccounting and Organizational ManagementOrganizational Management and Leadership

Is sibling rivalry good or bad for high technology organizations?

Khoja, Faiza·2008·The Journal of High Technology Management Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hitech.2008.06.006

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khoja, F.
Affiliations
University of Houston - Downtown (US)
Corresponding author
Khoja, Faiza
Venue
The Journal of High Technology Management Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
1047-8310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091098234
Cited by
10
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of High Technology Management Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
Keywords
sibling rivalry, high-tech enterprises, market breadth, performance standards, enterprise competitiveness, line managers, internal and external factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review