Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MANAGERS' DEVELOPMENTAL JOB EXPERIENCES.

Ohlott, P. J., Ruderman, M. N., McCauley, C. D.·1994·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

It has been suggested that one reason so few women have been promoted to senior management positions is that during their careers they experience fewer developmental job opportunities than men. To test this idea, we surveyed male and female managers about developmental components in their current jobs. Results suggest that men experience some greater task-related developmental challenges, but women experience greater developmental challenges stemming from obstacles they face in their jobs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256769

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Ohlott, P. J., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1994-02-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
46-67
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2008847234
Cited by
354
References
0
FWCI
29.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MANAGERS' DEVELOPMENTAL JOB EXPERIENCES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256769
The paper
Ohlott, P. J., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1994). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MANAGERS' DEVELOPMENTAL JOB EXPERIENCES. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256769

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.