The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical Ambivalence and Organizational Reward Systems
Abstract
Ethical ambivalence is a form of sociological ambivalence in which (a) the behaviors, attitudes, and norms that are shaped and maintained by the organizational reward system conflict with (b) the behaviors, attitudes, and norms congruent with the ethical values and judgments of organizational stakeholders. For example, though stakeholders require honest, open reporting, stonewalling and falsification of data may be rewarded. Examples of norms and counternorms are developed, and action strategies for researchers and managers are recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Cited by
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070399271002 · Cited by 414
Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness
Becker, T. E. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259104 · Cited by 406
Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision
Hunt, S. D., & Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z. (1993) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379303000107 · Cited by 314
A Comprehensive Framework for the Analysis of Ethical Behavior, with a Focus on Sales Organizations
Wotruba, T. R. (1990) · Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.1990.10753821 · Cited by 253
Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations
Sims, R. R. (1992) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/bf01686345 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Jansen, E., & Glinow, M. A. V.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136634989
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethical Ambivalence and Organizational Reward Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258049
- The paper
- Jansen, E., & Glinow, M. A. V. (1985). Ethical Ambivalence and Organizational Reward Systems. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
