The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative Methods in Management Research.
Abstract
Qualitative Research in Management Access Through Different Roles Preunderstanding and Understanding Case Study Research Quality of Academic Research and Management Consultancy An Action Science Paradigm
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Action research for operations management
Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210417515 · Cited by 1,526
Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G. (2002) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690200100203 · Cited by 932
Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own
Stenbacka, C. (2001) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005801 · Cited by 742
Characterizing Value as an Experience: Implications for Service Researchers and Managers
Helkkula, A., Kelleher, C., & Pihlström, M. (2012) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670511426897 · Cited by 605
Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change
Adams, C. A., & McNicholas, P. (2007) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513570710748553 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Toomer, E., Bowen, K., & Gummesson, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 735
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002656340
- Cited by
- 2,305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 80.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative Methods in Management Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2584051
- The paper
- Toomer, E., Bowen, K., & Gummesson, E. (1993). Qualitative Methods in Management Research. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.2307/2584051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
