The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability
Abstract
Ecological problems rooted in organizational activities have increased significantly, yet the role corporations play in achieving ecological sustainability is poorly understood. This article examines the implications of ecologically sustainable development for corporations. It articulates corporate ecological sustainability through the concepts of (a) total quality environmental management, (b) ecologically sustainable competitive strategies, (c) technology transfer through technology-for nature-swaps, and (d) reducing the impact of populations on ecosystems. It examines the implications that these concepts have for organizational research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity studies: Science and policy
Ehrlich, P. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.253.5021.758 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
PAULRAJ, A. (2011) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03212.x · Cited by 712
The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process
Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2005) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x · Cited by 590
Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F., & York, J. G. (2010) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.007 · Cited by 558
Ehnert, I., & Harry, W. (2012) · management revu · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2012-3-221 · Cited by 279
Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspective
Rivera‐Camino, J. (2007) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560710821206 · Cited by 270
Corporate Sustainable Development: Testing a New Scale Based on the Mainland Chinese Context
Chow, W. S., & Chen, Y. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0983-x · Cited by 265
Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India
Bodhanwala, S., & Bodhanwala, R. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2017-0381 · Cited by 194
Deconstructing corporate sustainability: A comparison of different stakeholder metrics
Antolín-López, R., Delgado-Ceballos, J., & Montiel, I. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.111 · Cited by 184
Corporate perspectives on the development and use of sustainability reports
Searcy, C., & Buslovich, R. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1701-7 · Cited by 180
Kajzer Mitchell, I., & Walinga, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.162 · Cited by 164
Sustainable procurement: Building legitimacy in the supply network
Crespin-Mazet, F., & Dontenwill, E. (2012) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2012.01.002 · Cited by 154
Camilleri, M. A. (2019) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.1909 · Cited by 149
Neumann, H. L., Martinez, L. M., & Martinez, L. F. (2021) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-11-2019-0405 · Cited by 134
Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective
Grob, S., & Benn, S. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2013.878259 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Shrivastava, P.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 936
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148884896
- Cited by
- 1,749
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
