The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm?
Abstract
This article examines the historically constituted dimensions of anthropocentrism, tracing the emergence of linear perspective, a camera theory of knowledge, and the human-nature dualism. These epistemological conventions are socially reproduced in organization science and management practice in their more contemporary anthropocentric forms: a disembodied form of technological knowing conjoined with an egocentric organizational orientation. Following this critique, the paradigmatic differences between anthropocentric and ecocentric approaches for dealing with issues related to the natural environment are discussed in what is referred to respectively as the environmental management and ecocentric responsibility paradigms. Our analysis suggests that corporate environmentalism and so-called “greening-business” approaches are grounded in the environmental management paradigm. It is argued that environmental management approaches are incommensurable with the ecocentric responsibility paradigm. The tensions bet...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 · Cited by 5,765
The theory of open systems in physics and biology
von Bertalanffy, L. (1950) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.111.2872.23 · Cited by 1,714
Cited by
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Green consumer behavior in an emerging economy: Confusion, credibility, and compatibility
Carrete, L., Castaño, R., Felix, R., Centeno, E., & González, E. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363761211274983 · Cited by 220
Consumer green behaviour: An approach towards environmental sustainability
Khan, M. S., Saengon, P., Alganad, A. M. N., Chongcharoen, D., & Farrukh, M. (2020) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2066 · Cited by 175
HR managers and environmental sustainability: strategic leaders or passive observers?
Harris, C., & Tregidga, H. (2012) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.561221 · Cited by 88
Seeking sustainable futures in marketing and consumer research
Davies, I., Oates, C. J., Tynan, C., Carrigan, M., Casey, K., Heath, T., Henninger, C. E., Lichrou, M., McDonagh, P., McDonald, S., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0144 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Purser, R. E., Park, C., & Montuori, A.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1053
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149184033
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/258965
- The paper
- Purser, R. E., Park, C., & Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/258965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.