Seeking sustainable futures in marketing and consumer research
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Seeking ways towards a sustainable future is the most dominant socio-political challenge of our time. Marketing should have a crucial role to play in leading research and impact in sustainability, yet it is limited by relying on cognitive behavioural theories rooted in the 1970s, which have proved to have little bearing on actual behaviour. This paper aims to interrogate why marketing is failing to address the challenge of sustainability and identify alternative approaches. Design/methodology/approach: The constraint in theoretical development contextualises the problem, followed by a focus on four key themes to promote theory development: developing sustainable people; models of alternative consumption; building towards sustainable marketplaces; and theoretical domains for the future. These themes were developed and refined during the 2018 Academy of Marketing workshop on seeking sustainable futures. MacInnis’s (2011) framework for conceptual contributions in marketing provides the narrative thread and structure. Findings: The current state of play is explicated, combining the four themes and MacInnis’s framework to identify the failures and gaps in extant approaches to the field. Research limitations/implications: This paper sets a new research agenda for the marketing discipline in quest for sustainable futures in marketing and consumer research. Practical implications: Approaches are proposed which will allow the transformation of the dominant socio-economic systems towards a model capable of promoting a sustainable future. Originality/value: The paper provides thought leadership in marketing and sustainability as befits the special issue, by moving beyond the description of the problem to making a conceptual contribution and setting a research agenda for the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This paper demonstrates the importance of families and intergenerational transference to the embedding of sustainable consumption behaviours and traditions.
“This paper provides insight for marketers and policy makers planning sustainable food strategy, most notably demonstrating the importance of families and intergenerational transference to the embedding of sustainable consumption behaviours and traditions (Davies et al., 2020).”
From 'I'd never cook it now': an exploration of intergenerational transference and its role in facilitating family food sustainability (2023) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2020
Cites
Ajzen, I. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · Cited by 7,629 · see citing works
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275 · see citing works
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536 · see citing works
Partnerships from <i>cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business</i>
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341 · see citing works
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089 · see citing works
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688 · see citing works
Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World
Belk, R. W. (1985) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208515 · Cited by 1,966 · see citing works
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777 · see citing works
Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective
Geels, F. W. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 · Cited by 1,718 · see citing works
A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing
MacInnis, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136 · Cited by 1,547 · see citing works
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.834803 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Review and Critical Assessment of Research on Marketing and the Environment
Kilbourne, W. E., & Beckmann, S. C. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/026725798784867716 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Theories of practice and sustainable consumption
Welch, D., & Warde, A. (2015) · Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption · doi:10.4337/9781783471270.00013 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Exploring inter-organizational paradoxes: Methodological lessons from a study of a grand challenge
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., Chalkias, K., & Cacciatori, E. (2019) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127018805345 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carrigan, M., Wells, V., & Athwal, N. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2021-0804 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Davies, I., Oates, C. J., Tynan, C., Carrigan, M., Casey, K., Heath, T., Henninger, C. E., Lichrou, M., McDonagh, P., McDonald, S., McKechnie, S., McLeay, F., O'Malley, L., & Wells, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Heriot-Watt University (GB)
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Minho (PT)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Limerick (IE)
- Robert Gordon University (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-09-23
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2911-2939
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015351966
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- sustainable futures, sustainability, marketing theory development, consumer research, cognitive behavioural theory, alternative consumption, research agenda, socio-economic change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review