The DOI matches its Crossref record; 158 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions
Abstract
In this article we first reflect on the significant and positive impact of postmodernism for organizational theorizing during the past decade. Through several examples we point to contributions that poststructuralist perspectives have brought to the field. Finally, we consider four contemporary theoretical tendencies—feminist poststructuralist theorizing, postcolonial analyses, actor-network theory, and narrative approaches to knowledge—as heirs (apparent) of the postmodern turn for organizational theorizing past postmodernism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1991.33 · Cited by 29,379
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Gilman, S. L., Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., & Massumi, B. (1989) · Journal of Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.2307/203963 · Cited by 22,692
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,462
(1976) · Cited by 10,813
Borderlands/La frontera: the new mestiza
Anzaldúa, G. (2017) · Censored · doi:10.1515/9780773551886-027 · Cited by 10,736
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,294
Crawford, T. H. (. H. (1994) · Configurations · doi:10.1353/con.1994.0041 · Cited by 7,931
Cited by
Alvesson, M. (2003) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/30040687 · Cited by 1,372
On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner
Cunliffe, A. L. (2004) · Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1177/1052562904264440 · Cited by 737
Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities
Cunliffe, A. L. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267030568004 · Cited by 677
A ‘time–space odyssey’: management control systems in two multinational organisations
Quattrone, P., & Hopper, T. (2005) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.006 · Cited by 473
Is Actor Network Theory Critique?
Whittle, A., & Spicer, A. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607082223 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141557742
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 158
- FWCI
- 27.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/259347
- The paper
- Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1999). Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/259347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.