Cited by 49Migration, Health and TraumaMigration, Racism, and Human RightsReproductive Health and Contraception

Programmatic Responses to Refugees' Reproductive Health Needs

Krause, Sandra K., Jones, Rachel K., Purdin, Susan J.·2000·International Family Planning Perspectives

Abstract

In a world where most people have less than optimal access to quality re p roductive health services, refugees * often live in circumstances of extraordinary instability that further hinder their access. Factors that define the refugee experience compound the challenge of attaining rep roductive health. Such challenges include violence, displacement and disruption of family and community, dislocation to unfamiliar and often overc rowded surroundings, lack of infrastru c t u re and access to basic survival needs, escalations in c o n flict resulting in new refugee influ x e s and intermittent evacuation of United Nations (UN) and nongovernmental org a n i-zation (NGO) personnel. Several events occurred from the early to the mid-1990s that increased re c o g n i-tion of refugees ’ re p roductive health needs and that generated programmatic responses to them. In 1994, the Wo m e n ’ s Commission for Refugee Women and C h i l d ren published a highly influential report documenting the lack of re p ro d u c-tive health services for re f u g e e s. 1 That was followed by the International Confere n c e on Population and Development, held in Cairo in 1994, which recognized the special re p roductive health needs of migrant populations, including refugees and the displaced. Following the Cairo meeting, the Inter-agency Working Group on Refugee Reproductive Health (IAW G) formed; it comprises re p resentatives of UN agencies, NGOs and governments. A round the same time, re p resentati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2648256

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, S. K., Jones, R. K., & Purdin, S. J.
Venue
International Family Planning Perspectives
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-12
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
181
ISSN
0190-3187 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031583219
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Family Planning Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
humanitarian crisis, safe motherhood, family planning, sexual and gender-based violence, sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, post-abortion care, female genital mutilation, adolescent reproductive health, international health programs, program implementation challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review