Programmatic Responses to Refugees' Reproductive Health Needs
Abstract
In a world where most people have less than optimal access to quality re p roductive health services, refugees * often live in circumstances of extraordinary instability that further hinder their access. Factors that define the refugee experience compound the challenge of attaining rep roductive health. Such challenges include violence, displacement and disruption of family and community, dislocation to unfamiliar and often overc rowded surroundings, lack of infrastru c t u re and access to basic survival needs, escalations in c o n flict resulting in new refugee influ x e s and intermittent evacuation of United Nations (UN) and nongovernmental org a n i-zation (NGO) personnel. Several events occurred from the early to the mid-1990s that increased re c o g n i-tion of refugees ’ re p roductive health needs and that generated programmatic responses to them. In 1994, the Wo m e n ’ s Commission for Refugee Women and C h i l d ren published a highly influential report documenting the lack of re p ro d u c-tive health services for re f u g e e s. 1 That was followed by the International Confere n c e on Population and Development, held in Cairo in 1994, which recognized the special re p roductive health needs of migrant populations, including refugees and the displaced. Following the Cairo meeting, the Inter-agency Working Group on Refugee Reproductive Health (IAW G) formed; it comprises re p resentatives of UN agencies, NGOs and governments. A round the same time, re p resentati…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In populations without formal infrastructure, such as refugee camps, training and assessment of baccalaureate-level midwives is neither feasible nor possible.
“In populations without formal infrastructure, such as in refugee camps, training and assessment of baccalaureate-level midwives is neither feasible nor possible and there are a limited number of publications on the training of birth attendants in such settings [4, 15–20].”
From Accelerated Training of Skilled Birth Attendants in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Multiple Methods Program Evaluation (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
There are a limited number of publications on the training of birth attendants in refugee settings.
“In populations without formal infrastructure, such as in refugee camps, training and assessment of baccalaureate-level midwives is neither feasible nor possible and there are a limited number of publications on the training of birth attendants in such settings [4, 15–20].”
From Accelerated Training of Skilled Birth Attendants in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Multiple Methods Program Evaluation (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Family planning in conflict: results of cross-sectional baseline surveys in three African countries.
McGinn, T., Austin, J., Anfinson, K., Amsalu, R., Casey, S. E., Fadulalmula, S. I., Langston, A., Lee-Jones, L., Meyers, J., Mubiru, F. K., et al. (2011) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/1752-1505-5-11 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Mullany, L. C., Lee, T. J., Yone, L., Lee, C. I., Teela, K. C., Paw, P., Shwe Oo, E. K., Maung, C., Kuiper, H., Masenior, N. F., et al. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000317 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
White, A. L., Min, T. H., Gross, M. M., Kajeechiwa, L., Thwin, M. M., Hanboonkunupakarn, B., Than, H. H., Zin, T. W., Rijken, M. J., Hoogenboom, G., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164363 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
O'Heir, J. (2004) · Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health · doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2004.04.031 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Reproductive health services for refugees by refugees: an example from Guinea
Von Roenne, A., Von Roenne, F., Kollie, S., Swaray, Y., Sondorp, E., & Borchert, M. (2010) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01112.x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Srikanok, S., Parker, D. M., Parker, A. L., Lee, T., Min, A. M., Ontuwong, P., Oo Tan, S., Sirinonthachai, S., & McGready, R. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172007 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Perera, S., Maung, C., Hla, S., Moo Moo, H., Than Lwin, S., Bruck, C., Smith, T., Bakker, M., Akhoon, C., & Sarkar, I. N. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052571 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krause, S. K., Jones, R. K., & Purdin, S. J.
- ORCID
- Jones, Rachel K.
- Venue
- International Family Planning Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 181
- ISSN
- 0190-3187 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031583219
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Family Planning Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Keywords
- humanitarian crisis, safe motherhood, family planning, sexual and gender-based violence, sexually transmitted infections, HIV/AIDS, post-abortion care, female genital mutilation, adolescent reproductive health, international health programs, program implementation challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review