Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 911

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning

Houser, Jeffrey A., Desrosieres, Alain, Naish, Camille·1999·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Introduction - arguing from social facts prefects and geometrics judges and astronomers averages and the realism of aggregates correlation and the realism of causes statistics and the state - France and Great Britain statistics and the state - Germany and the United States the part for the whole - monographs or representative sampling classifying and encoding modelling and adjusting conclusion - disputing the indisputable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2654208

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 911

Metadata

Authors
Houser, J. A., Desrosieres, A., & Naish, C.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1999-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
361
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328876929
Cited by
911
References
0
FWCI
25.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2654208
The paper
Houser, J. A., Desrosieres, A., & Naish, C. (1999). The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654208

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.