Cited by 596Smart Cities and TechnologiesUrban Planning and GovernanceQuality of Life Measurement

Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards

Open access
Kitchin, Rob, Lauriault, Tracey P., McArdle, Gavin·2015·Regional Studies, Regional Science

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s a plethora of indicator projects have been developed and adopted by cities seeking to measure and monitor various aspects of urban systems. These have been accompanied by city benchmarking endeavours that seek to compare intra- and inter-urban performance. More recently, the data underpinning such projects have started to become more open to citizens, more real-time in nature generated through sensors and locative/social media, and displayed via interactive visualisations and dashboards that can be accessed via the internet. In this paper, we examine such initiatives arguing that they advance a narrowly conceived but powerful realist epistemology – the city as visualised facts – that is reshaping how managers and citizens come to know and govern cities. We set out how and to what ends indicator, benchmarking and dashboard initiatives are being employed by cities. We argue that whilst these initiatives often seek to make urban processes and performance more transparent and to improve decision making, they are also underpinned by a naive instrumental rationality, are open to manipulation by vested interests, and suffer from often unacknowledged methodological and technical issues. Drawing on our own experience of working on indicator and dashboard projects, we argue for a conceptual re-imaging of such projects as data assemblages – complex, politically-infused, socio-technical systems that, rather than reflecting cities, actively frame and produce them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21681376.2014.983149

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G.
Affiliations
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
Corresponding author
Kitchin, Rob
Venue
Regional Studies, Regional Science
Published
2015-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
6-28
ISSN
2168-1376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053272364
Cited by
596
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2
FWCI
68.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Regional Studies Regional Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (ERC-2012-AdG-323636)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
urban indicators, real-time dashboard, urban governance, data assemblages, sensor data, social media data, open data, instrumental rationality, socio-technical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review