The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory
Abstract
In incorporating social process into a model of dynamics of mental disorders, this text questions individualistic model favoured in current psychiatric and psychoanalytic theory. While conventional psychiatric viewpoint seeks causes of mental illness, Scheff views the symptoms of mental as violation of residual rules - social norms so taken for granted that they are not explicitly verbalized. The sociological theory developed by Scheff to account for such behaviour provides a framework for studies reported in subsequent chapters. Two key assumptions emerge: first, that most chronic mental illness is in part a social role; and second, that societal reaction may in part determine entry into that role. Throughout, sociological model of mental illness is compared and contrasted with more conventional medical and psychological models in an attempt to delineate significant problems for further analysis and research. This third edition has been revised and expanded to encompass controversy prompted by first edition, and also to re-evaluate developments in field. New to this edition are discussions of use of psychoactive drugs in treatment of mental illness, changing mental health laws, new social science and psychiatric studies, and controversy surrounding labelling theory of mental illness itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Attribution Model of Public Discrimination Towards Persons with Mental Illness
Corrigan, P., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/1519806 · Cited by 1,407
Link, B. G., Struening, E. L., Neese-Todd, S., Asmussen, S., & Phelan, J. C. (2001) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1621 · Cited by 1,254
Impact of HIV‐related stigma on treatment adherence: systematic review and meta‐synthesis
Katz, I. T., Ryu, A. E., Onuegbu, A. G., Psaros, C., Weiser, S. D., Bangsberg, D. R., & Tsai, A. C. (2013) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.7448/ias.16.3.18640 · Cited by 1,126
Pope, H. G. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770310017001 · Cited by 632
Pescosolido, B. A., Martin, J. K., Lang, A., & Olafsdottir, S. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.018 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Coster, S. D., & Scheff, T. J.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994315650
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2654372
- The paper
- Coster, S. D., & Scheff, T. J. (2001). Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.