Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Policing Space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department

Glaeser, Edward L., Herbert, Steve·1997·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Policing Space examines the Los Angeles Police Department as an agency of territoriality. Based upon ethnographic fieldwork, the book explicates the variety of ways in which officers pursue strategies of social control through spatial control. Effective territorial control, the book demonstrates, is essential to effective policing. Policing Space also explains the dominant motivations behind police territoriality through use of the concept of order, which is defined as a set of rules and practices centered around a primary value. Six such orders -- law, bureaucratic control, adventure/machismo, safety, competence and morality -- shape how officers define and attempt to control space. The importance of each normative order is amply illustrated with numerous vignettes from the fieldwork. The book contributes to a wide variety of literatures, including those concerning state theory, geography and the law, and the social organization of policing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2654662

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Glaeser, E. L., & Herbert, S.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1997-11
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
750
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982470912
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
46.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.