Cited by 72Labor Movements and UnionsEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Creating a Just and Democratic Workplace: More Engagement, Less Hierarchy

Rothschild, Joyce·2000·Contemporary Sociology

Abstract

Joyce Rothschild, Creating a Just and Democratic Workplace: More Engagement, Less Hierarchy, Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 1, Utopian Visions: Engaged Sociologies for the 21st Century (Jan., 2000), pp. 195-213

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2654944

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rothschild, J.
Corresponding author
Rothschild, Joyce
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
2000-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
195
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323307743
Cited by
72
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
workplace democracy, organizational justice, employee engagement, organizational hierarchy, workplace reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review