The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis
Abstract
Observation and experience interpretation words and world beyond experiences sociological projects drawing boundaries proof and self-evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets
MacKenzie, D. (2009) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004 · Cited by 788
The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action
Miettinen, R. (2000) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/026013700293458 · Cited by 658
Barth, F. (2002) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/324131 · Cited by 469
The Credit Crisis as a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge
MacKenzie, D. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/659639 · Cited by 417
Constructivism in computer science education
Ben-Ari, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education · doi:10.1145/273133.274308 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagstrom, W. O., Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J.
- Venue
- Contemporary Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 518
- ISSN
- 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002438148
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 79.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2655138
- The paper
- Hagstrom, W. O., Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1997). Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
