The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Kuznets Curve and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970 to 1990
Abstract
The authors examine the determinants of inequality in the distribution of family income in approximately 3,100 counties of the United States in 1970, 1980, and 1990. Such a study provides a window on global trends in social inequality during the period, which spans the tail end of the Kuznets curve and the more recent upswing in income inequality. Results from random-effects regression models that control for unmeasured heterogeneity among states reveal the continued importance of the Kuznetsian pattern of declining inequality with economic development, a positive effect of urbanization on inequality, a declining positive impact of sector dualism, an increasing positive effect of educational heterogeneity, and a persistent effect of racial dualism. Several variables associated with the recent upswing in inequality have significant effects : female labor-force participation (negative), female-headed households (positive), percent of the population over age 65 (changes from positive to negative over the period), manufacturing employment (negative), and unemployment (ambiguous). They also discuss methods of estimating the Gini coefficient for income inequality at the county level and measures of sector (farm/nonfarm) dualism, racial (Black/White) dualism, and educational heterogeneity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Cited by
Income Inequality and Income Segregation
Reardon, S. F., & Bischoff, K. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/657114 · Cited by 1,047
Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies
Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2003.0009 · Cited by 785
Self-citationGlobalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries
Alderson, A. S., & Nielsen, F. (2002) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/341329 · Cited by 759
Self-citationHipp, J. R. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200501 · Cited by 414
Ezzati, M., Friedman, A. B., Kulkarni, S. C., & Murray, C. J. L. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050066 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327267718
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Kuznets Curve and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970 to 1990. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2657450
- The paper
- Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1997). The Kuznets Curve and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.