Cited by 255Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchPolitical Science Research and EducationPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Methodology of Necessary Conditions

Braumoeller, Bear F., Goertz, Gary·2000·American Journal of Political Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2669285

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 255

Metadata

Authors
Braumoeller, B. F., & Goertz, G.
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2000-10
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
844
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321718921
Cited by
255
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
25.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
necessary conditions, causal inference, methodological issues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review