The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS-Oriented Approach
Abstract
1 Introduction.- 2 An Example-Based Tour in Linear Mixed Models.- 2.1 Fixed Effects and Random Effects in Mixed Models.- 2.2 General Linear Mixed Models.- 2.3 Variance Components Estimation and Best Linear Unbiased Prediction.- 2.3.1 Variance Components Estimation.- 2.3.2 Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP).- 2.3.3 Examples and the SAS Procedure MIXED.- 2.4 Fixed Effects: Estimation and Hypotheses Testing.- 2.4.1 General Considerations.- 2.4.2 Examples and the SAS Procedure MIXED.- 2.5 Case Studies.- 2.5.1 Cell Proliferation.- 2.5.2 A Cross-Over Experiment.- 2.5.3 A Multicenter Trial.- 3 Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data.- 3.1 Introduction.- 3.2 The Study of Natural History of Prostate Disease.- 3.3 A Two-Stage Analysis.- 3.4 The General Linear Mixed-Effects Model.- 3.4.1 The Model.- 3.4.2 Maximum Likelihood Estimation.- 3.4.3 Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.- 3.4.4 Comparison between ML and REML Estimation.- 3.4.5 Model-Fitting Procedures.- 3.5 Example.- 3.5.1 The SAS Program.- 3.5.2 The SAS Output.- 3.5.3 Estimation Problems due to Small Variance Components.- 3.6 The RANDOM and REPEATED Statements.- 3.7 Testing and Estimating Contrasts of Fixed Effects.- 3.7.1 The CONTRAST Statement.- 3.7.2 Model Reduction.- 3.7.3 The ESTIMATE Statement.- 3.8 PROC MIXED versus PROC GLM.- 3.9 Tests for the Need of Random Effects.- 3.9.1 The Likelihood Ratio Test.- 3.9.2 Applied to the Prostate Data.- 3.10 Comparing Non-Nested Covariance Structures.- 3.11 Estimating the Random Effects.- 3.12 General Guidelines for Model Construction.- 3.12.1 Selection of a Preliminary Mean Structure.- 3.12.2 Selection of Random-Effects.- 3.12.3 Selection of Residual Covariance Structure.- 3.12.4 Model Reduction.- 3.13 Model Checks and Diagnostic Tools ?.- 3.13.1 Normality Assumption for the Random Effects ?.- 3.13.2 The Detection of Influential Subjects ?.- 3.13.3 Checking the Covariance Structure ?.- 4 Case Studies.- 4.1 Example 1: Variceal Pressures.- 4.2 Example 2: Growth Curves.- 4.3 Example 3: Blood Pressures.- 4.4 Example 4: Growth Data.- 4.4.1 Model 1.- 4.4.2 Model 2.- 4.4.3 Model 3.- 4.4.4 Graphical Exploration.- 4.4.5 Model 4.- 4.4.6 Model 5.- 4.4.7 Model 6.- 4.4.8 Model 7.- 4.4.9 Model 8.- 5 Linear Mixed Models and Missing Data.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 Missing Data.- 5.2.1 Missing Data Patterns.- 5.2.2 Missing Data Mechanisms.- 5.2.3 Ignorability.- 5.3 Approaches to Incomplete Data.- 5.4 Complete Case Analysis.- 5.4.1 Growth Data.- 5.5 Simple Forms of Imputation.- 5.5.1 Last Observation Carried Forward.- 5.5.2 Imputing Unconditional Means.- 5.5.3 Buck's Method: Conditional Mean Imputation.- 5.5.4 Discussion of Imputation Techniques.- 5.6 Available Case Methods.- 5.6.1 Growth Data.- 5.7 Likelihood-Based Ignorable Analysis and PROC MIXED.- 5.7.1 Growth Data.- 5.7.2 Summary.- 5.8 How Ignorable Is Missing At Random ? ?.- 5.8.1 Information and Sampling Distributions ?.- 5.8.2 Illustration ?.- 5.8.3 Example ?.- 5.8.4 Implications for PROC MIXED.- 5.9 The Expectation-Maximization Algorithm ?.- 5.10 Multiple Imputation ?.- 5.10.1 General Theory ?.- 5.10.2 Illustration: Growth Data ?.- 5.11 Exploring the Missing Data Process.- 5.11.1 Growth Data.- 5.11.2 Informative Non-Response.- 5.11.3 OSWALD for Informative Non-Response.- A Inference for Fixed Effects.- A.1 Estimation.- A.2 Hypothesis Testing.- A.3 Determination of Degrees of Freedom.- A.4 Satterthwaite's Procedure.- B Variance Components and Standard Errors.- C Details on Table 2.10: Expected Mean Squares.- D Example 2.8: Cell Proliferation.- References.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology
Oakes, J. M. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004 · Cited by 760
Verheul, R., Van Den Bosch, L. M. C., Koeter, M. W. J., De Ridder, M. A. J., Stijnen, T., & Van Den Brink, W. (2003) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.182.2.135 · Cited by 722
The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments
Buyse, M., Molenberghs, G., Burzykowski, T., Renard, D., & Geys, H. (2000) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.49 · Cited by 624
Self-citationPanda, A., Qian, F., Mohanty, S., van Duin, D., Newman, F. K., Zhang, L., Chen, S., Towle, V., Belshe, R. B., Fikrig, E., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901022 · Cited by 548
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenth, R. V., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 443
- Pages
- 1240
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073453589
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS-Oriented Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2669875
- The paper
- Lenth, R. V., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (1998). Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS-Oriented Approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.