CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 81

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Evolutionary Ecology, Selectionist Archaeology, and Behavioral Archaeology

Broughton, Jack M., O'Connell, James F.·1999·American Antiquity
DOI 10.2307/2694351
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To promote a dialogue between competing but potentially compatible approaches in American archaeology, Schiffer (1996) examined the relationships between two distinct research programs: "behavioral" archaeology and evolutionary archaeology. An approach grounded in evolutionary ecology was not included in that analysis. In this paper, we reply to Schiffer's call for dialogue by outlining the relationships, as we see them, between evolutionary ecology, selectionist archaeology, and behavioral archaeology. We conclude that evolutionary ecology holds the greatest promise as a scientific approach for the investigation of important problems in human behavioral evolution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2694351

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. 10.2307/282009 · DOI
  2. 10.1086/jar.29.1.3629622 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/282378 · DOI
  4. Schiffer, 1987, Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record.
  5. Winterhalder, 1992, Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior,, 3
  6. Schiffer, 1995, Expanding Archaeology,, 22
  7. 10.2307/279771 · DOI
  8. Raab, 1992, Essays on the Prehistory of Maritime California,, 173
  9. 10.1086/203601 · DOI
  10. Krebs, 1991, Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach,
  11. Janetski J. 1997 Fremont Hunting and Resource Intensification in the Eastern Great Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: (in press) · DOI
  12. Cohen, 1981, Affluent Foragers: Pacific Coasts East and West,
  13. Chatters, 1987, Archaeological Investigations at Ijxke Britton, California,
  14. Neff, 1992, Ceramics and Evolution., Archaeological Method and Theory, 4, 141
  15. 10.2307/278203 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF02231877 · DOI
  17. Hutchinson, 1965, The Ecological Theater and the Evolutionary Play.
  18. Gilford, 1936, Essays Presented to A.L. Kroeber,, 87
  19. Krebs, 1997, Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach,
  20. Brown, 1964, The Evolution of Diversity in Avian Territorial Systems., Wilson Bulletin, 76, 160
  21. Jones, 1995, Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues,, 13
  22. Dunnell, 1992, Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future,, 207
  23. Kroeber A.L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78.
  24. Krebs, 1978, Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach.
  25. Raab, 1995, Debating Cultural Evolution: Regional Implication of Fishing Intensification at Eel Point, San Clemente Island., Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 31, 3
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4757-5042-3 · DOI
  27. O'Brien, 1995, Expanding Archaeology,, 143
  28. O'Brien, 1996, Evolutionary Archaeology: Theory and Application,, 1
  29. Simms S.R. 1992 Ethnoarchaeology: Obnoxious Spectator, Trivial Pursuit, or the Keys to a Time Machine. In Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future, edited by Wandsnider L. , pp. 186–198. Occasional Paper 20. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
  30. 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90039-R · DOI
  31. Broughton, 1995, Resource Depression and Intensification during the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay: Evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound Vertebrate Fauna.
  32. 10.1016/S0169-5347(96)10060-4 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Krebs, 1984, Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach,
  34. Erlandson, 1995, Cabrillo, the Chumash, and Old World Diseases., Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 17, 153
  35. Dunnell, 1996, Evolutionary Archaeology: Theory and Application,, vii
  36. O'Connell J.F. 1998 Grandmothering and the Evolution of Homo erectus. Journal of Human Evolution (in press).
  37. 10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.000325 · DOI
  38. Dunnell, 1982, Science, Social Science, and Common Sense: The Agonizing Dilemma of Modern Archaeology., Journal of Archaeological Research, 38, 1
  39. Kelly, 1995, The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways.
  40. 10.1086/283062 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0278-4165(92)90013-2 · DOI
  42. Lambert, 1994, War and Peace on the Western Front: A Study of Violent Conflict and its Correlates in Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Societies of Coastal Southern California.
  43. Dyson-Hudson, 1979, Human Territoriality: An Ecological Reassessment., American Anthropologist, 80, 21—41
  44. Chatters, 1996, Prehistory of the Middle Pit River, Northeastern California,
  45. Raab, 1996, Debating Prehistory in Coastal Southern California: Resource Intensification Versus Political Economy., Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 18, 64
  46. Raab, 1992, An Optimal Foraging Analysis of Prehistoric Shellfish Collecting on San Clemente Island, California., Journal of Ethnohiology, 12, 63
  47. 10.1525/aa.1992.94.2.02a00040 · DOI
  48. Graves, 1995, Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues,, 149
  49. McKellar, 1983, Correlations and the Explanation of Distributions., Atlatl, Occasional Papers, 4, 3
  50. Heizer, 1958, Prehistoric Central California: A Problem in Historical-Developmental Classification., University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, 41, 19
  51. 10.1017/CBO9780511558221.003 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Dunnell R.C. 1994 Why Is There a Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology? In Arqueologia de Cazadores-Recolectores: Limites, Casos y Aperturas, edited by Lanata J.L. and Borrero L.A. , pp. 7–15. Arqueologia Contemporanea 5. Edicion Especial 1994.
  53. Beaton, 1973, The Nature of Aboriginal Exploitation of Mollusc Populations in Southern California.
  54. 10.2307/2694835 · DOI
  55. 10.1006/jasc.1996.0033 · DOI
  56. Blumenschine, 1993, From Bones to Behavior: Ethnoarchaeological and Experimental Contributions to the Interpretation ofFaunal Remains,, 273
  57. 10.2307/277978 · DOI
  58. Borgerhoff Mulder, 1980, Modeling Change in Prehistoric Subsistence Economies,, 121
  59. Borgerhoff Mulder, 1991, Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach,, 69
  60. 10.2307/282512 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/B978-0-12-003103-0.50007-1 · DOI
  62. Bayham, 1997, Prehistory of the Middle Pit River, Northeastern California,, 343
  63. 10.2307/282110 · DOI
  64. 10.2307/282419 · DOI
  65. Fagan, 1995, Ancient North America: The Archaeology of a Continent, Second Edition.
  66. O'Brien, 1995, Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues,, 175
  67. 10.1006/jasc.1994.1050 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/BF02231450 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Schiffer, 1992, Technological Perspectives on Behavioral Change.
  70. 10.1016/B978-0-12-505980-0.50012-4 · DOI
  71. Broughton, 1994, Declines in Mammalian Foraging Efficiency during the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay, California, Journal of Anthropological A rchaeology, 13, 371 —401
  72. 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1336 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1038/scientificamerican0478-90 · DOI
  74. 10.2307/282513 · DOI
  75. Wohlgemuth, 1996, Resource Intensification in Prehistoric Central California: Evidence from Archaeobotanical Data., Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 18, 81
  76. Glassow, 1996, Purisimeno Chumash Prehistory: Maritime Adaptations Along the Southern California Coast.
  77. Basgall, 1987, Resource Intensification among Hunter-Gatherers: Acorn Economies in Prehistoric California., Research in Economic Anthropology, 9, 21
  78. Braun, 1987, Emergent Horticultural Economies of the Eastern Woodlands,, 153
  79. 10.2307/2694834 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Binford, 1981, Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths.
  81. 10.1002/evan.1360010107 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/ajpa.1330800305 · DOI
  83. Preston, 1996, Serpent in Eden: Dispersal of Foreign Diseases into Pre-Mission California., Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 18, 2
  84. Stephens, 1986, Foraging Theory.
  85. 10.1086/204035 · DOI
  86. 10.1006/jaar.1995.1017 · DOI
  87. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0658-8 · DOI
  88. Colten, 1995, Faunal Exploitation During the Middle to Late Period Transition on Santa Cruz Island, California., Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 17, 93
  89. 10.1086/283054 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1017/S0003598X0008577X · DOI
  91. McGuire, 1995, Expanding Archaeology,, 162
  92. Hawkes, 1998, Evolutionary Biology and Human Behavior: 20 Years Later,
  93. 10.2307/279244 · DOI
  94. 10.1080/00231940.1979.11757918 · DOI
  95. Schiffer, 1976, Behavioral Archaeology.
  96. 10.1086/204693 · DOI
  97. 10.1006/jaar.1995.1004 · DOI
  98. 10.1017/S0003598X00080765 · DOI
  99. 10.1038/348027a0 · DOI
  100. 10.1525/aa.1983.85.3.02a00060 · DOI
  101. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9945-3_2 · DOI
  102. Maxwell, 1995, Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues,, 113
  103. Preston, 1997, Contested Eden: California Before the Gold Rush,, 260
  104. Goldschmidt, 1974, Indian Land Use and Occupancy in California, Volume 1,, 52
  105. 10.1086/204646 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 81

Metadata

Authors
Broughton, J. M., & O'Connell, J. F.
Venue
American Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1999-01
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
153-165
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
DOI
10.2307/2694351
Cited by
81
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 6594 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review