The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Knowing Practice: The Clinical Encounter of Chinese Medicine.
Abstract
Introduction - we take practice to be our guide Chinese medicine as institutional object and historical moment preliminary orientations - sources and manifestations, unity and multiplicity the clinical encounter observed description and analysis in Kanbing the syndrome-therapy pivot remanifesting the syndrome and qualifying classification, specificity, history and action - an overview of the clinical encounter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Randomized Controlled Crime: Postcolonial Sciences in Alternative Medicine Research
Adams, V. (2002) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631270203200503 · Cited by 176
State, Cosmos, and Body in The Last Three Centuries B. C.
Sivin, N. (1995) · Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies · doi:10.2307/2719419 · Cited by 116
How Did Chinese Medicine Become Experiential? The Political Epistemology of Jingyan
Lei, S. H.-L. (2002) · positions: asia critique · doi:10.1215/10679847-10-2-333 · Cited by 69
Applying Evidence-Based Medicine to Traditional Chinese Medicine: Debate and Strategy
Shea, J. L. (2006) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2006.12.255 · Cited by 58
What could ′integrative′ medicine mean? Social science perspectives on contemporary Ayurveda
Sujatha, V (2011) · Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine · doi:10.4103/0975-9476.85549 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Schipper, H., Minden, K., & Farquhar, J.
- Venue
- Pacific Affairs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 264
- ISSN
- 0030-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972260929
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowing Practice: The Clinical Encounter of Chinese Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2761379
- The paper
- Schipper, H., Minden, K., & Farquhar, J. (1995). Knowing Practice: The Clinical Encounter of Chinese Medicine. Pacific Affairs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2761379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
