Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Knowing Practice: The Clinical Encounter of Chinese Medicine.

Schipper, H., Minden, K., Farquhar, Judith·1995·Pacific Affairs
DOI 10.2307/2761379
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction - we take practice to be our guide Chinese medicine as institutional object and historical moment preliminary orientations - sources and manifestations, unity and multiplicity the clinical encounter observed description and analysis in Kanbing the syndrome-therapy pivot remanifesting the syndrome and qualifying classification, specificity, history and action - an overview of the clinical encounter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2761379

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schipper, H., Minden, K., & Farquhar, J.
Venue
Pacific Affairs
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1995
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
264
ISSN
0030-851X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/2761379
OpenAlex
W1972260929
Cited by
367
References
0
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.