CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Historical Studies in Central AmericaArchaeology and Cultural HeritageAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

Some unusual ceramics from esmeraldas, ecuador

Corbett, John M.·1953·American Antiquity
DOI 10.2307/276913
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In 1940, while on a commission for the Ecuadorian Government to the site of La Tolita in the province of Esmeraldas, Ecuador, the author had an opportunity to examine and photograph a few specimens in the collection of Sr. Yannuzzelli. Sr. Yannuzzelli maintained a ranch at the archaeological site of La Tolita which is located a few miles up the Rio Santiago from the coastal town of Limones and is not far from the Colombian border. Several large flat top mounds (Fig. 56, 1) and about 25 increasingly smaller ones comprise the present site. It had been visited about 30 years previously by both Uhle and Saville, but neither one conducted adequate excavations there. It is a favorite site for local inhabitants to pan gold, and in 1940, Sr. Yannuzzelli was actually engaged in carrying out extensive, large scale, placer mining operations within the archaeological zone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/276913

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Arnold, 1951, Science., 113
  2. JljóN Y CamaañO, 1921–24, Puruha, ANH-B, 2, 1–60
  3. Lothrop, 1937, Cocle, Part I, PM-M, 7
  4. Lothrop, 1942, Cocle, Part II, PM-M, 8
  5. Bushnell, 1951, The Archaeology of the Santa Elena Peninsula in Southwest Ecuador.
  6. Rowe, 1942, Notes on Middle American Archeology and Ethnology.
  7. Strong, 1943, Cross Sections of New World Prehistory, SI-MC, 104
  8. Willey, 1948, A Functional Analysis of “Horizon Styles.” In “A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology, SAA-M
  9. JljóN Y CamaañO, 1949, La Prensa Catolica., Maranga
  10. Bennett, 1944, Archeological Regions of Columbia: A Ceramic Survey, YUPA
  11. Uhle, 1933, Talleres Tipograficos Nacionales.
  12. Merwin, 1932, PM-M., 3
  13. Kulp, 1951, Science., 114
  14. Kulp, 1952, Science., 116
  15. Uhle, 1923, ANH-B., 6, 87–92
  16. D’Harcourt, 1947, Archeologie de la Province d’Esmeraldas (Equateur), SAP-J, 34, 61–200
  17. JljóN Y CamaañO, 1914, Estudios de Prehistoria Americana., II
  18. Spinden, 1928, AMNH.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Authors
Corbett, J. M.
Venue
American Antiquity
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1953-10
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
145-152
ISSN
  • 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-5064
DOI
10.2307/276913
OpenAlex
W2325907848
Cited by
2
References
19
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 23127 d)
Locations
American Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
Esmeraldas, Ecuadorian archaeology, pre-Columbian pottery, archaeological site, placer mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review