The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Universal Design for Learning: Technology and Pedagogy
Abstract
When educators hear the term universal design for learning (UDL), most associate it with technology (cf. Zascavage & Winterman, 2009). However, UDL is not solely about the use of technology in education (KingSears, 2001; Orkwis & McLane, 1998; Rose & Meyer, 2000). UDL is also about the pedagogy, or instructional practices, used for students with and without disabilities. The concept of universal design, which originated in the field of architecture in the 1970s by Ron Mace (Center for Universal Design, 1997), continues to have a major influence, particularly reflected in building structures that are now required to incorporate features (e.g., ramps, doorway widths) that enable more people with different needs to access buildings without the need to retrofit structural details (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 1991). The main feature of universally designed buildings and products (whether a business or a home) is that they allow people with unique needs to independently and immediately use them is. Some of these features are structural (door handles instead of door knobs); others are technological (such as closed captions on television sets). Within universal design, seven guiding principles drive the design of products and environments so that they are usable by more people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design (Connell et al., 1997). When educators employ these principles in the design and delivery of instruction, acc…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some employed UD [15] and UDL [28] (frameworks with origins in disability activism in response to access barriers) to create inclusive educational experiences for the general student population.”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“some employed UD [15] and UDL [28] (frameworks with origins in disability activism in response to access barriers)”
From Where are the Disabled Students?: A Literature Review of Disability Inclusion in Computing Education Research (2026) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Center for Universal Design., 1997, Environments and products for all people
- Connell B. R., 1997, Principles of universal design
- 10.1007/BF03395471 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00267.x · DOI
- 10.1177/073724770503000205 · DOI
- 10.1080/105735601300007606 · DOI
- 10.1177/00222194040370020201 · DOI
- 10.1177/105345120103700201 · DOI
- Orkwis R., 1998, A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access
- Rose D., 2000, Educational Leadership, 58, 39
- 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00282.x · DOI
- Suh J. M., Moyer P. S. (2008). Scaffolding special needs students' learning of fraction equivalence using virtual manipulatives. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Morelia, Mexico.
- 10.1177/00222194060390060201 · DOI
- Zascavage V., Winterman K. G. (2009). What middle school educators should know about assistive technology and universal design for learning. Middle School Journal, 46–52. · DOI
Cited by
Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695 · Cited by 197
Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner’s Perspective
Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zimmermann, T., & Ford, D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3503508 · Cited by 109
Garcia Ramos, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1654805 · Cited by 8
Figueira, I., Cisneros, J. M., Weber, J. L., Sanka, W., Phan, K., Wong-Ma, J., & Branham, S. M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 57th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V.1 · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772561 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- King-Sears, M.
- Affiliations
- Graduate School of Education, George Mason University
- Venue
- Learning Disability Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 199-201
- ISSN
- 0731-9487 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-376X
- OpenAlex
- W155221103
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learning Disability Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Keywords
- Universal Design for Learning, learning disabilities, educational technology, pedagogy, universal design principles, individualized education program, accommodation, manipulative materials, inclusive education, students with disabilities, differentiated instruction, assistive technology, assistive devices, assistive software, assistive services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal Design for Learning: Technology and Pedagogy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/27740372
- The paper
- King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal Design for Learning: Technology and Pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740372