The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: An Assessment of Alternative Explanations
Abstract
The «paradox of the contented female worker» is that although women have jobs with lower pay and less authority than men, they are equally satisfied with their jobs and employers. This paradox is demonstrated in a sample of male and female professionals and managers. Five possible explanations of the paradox are assessed: 1) women's lesser job rewards are perceived as equitable because they are matched by lower job inputs; 2) women's lesser rewards are perceived as equitable because women compare themselves with female coworkers, whose rewards also are low; 3) women have lower entitlement standards; 4) men value pay and authority more highly than do women; and 5) for both men and women, satisfaction is determined by subjective jow rewards rather than by salary-related factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
New directions in equity research.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033967 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 269
Self-citationHopcroft, R. L., & McLaughlin, J. (2012) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.12.006 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Phelan, J.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315883569
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: An Assessment of Alternative Explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2786704
- The paper
- Phelan, J. (1994). The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: An Assessment of Alternative Explanations. Social Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.