The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical Attractiveness and Intellectual Competence: A Meta-Analytic Review
Abstract
Meta-analysis was used to test hypotheses about the relationship between physical attractiveness and intellectual competence. in support of status generalization theory and implicit personality theory, attractive people were perceived as more competent than less attractive people. Attractiveness effects were stronger for males than for females, and stronger when explicit information about competence was absent than when it was present, in keeping with status generalization theory. In partial support of status generalization theory and expectancy theory, attractiveness was related to actual competence in children, but not in adults. Direct measures of competence were influenced strongly more by attractiveness than were indirect measures, as predicted by status generalization theory. implications for theory, organizational policy, and future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033731 · Cited by 3,865
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Self-citationEagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109 · Cited by 1,875
Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.
Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.10.867 · Cited by 853
Cited by
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 · Cited by 1,558
Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002 · Cited by 1,565
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x · Cited by 732
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016338 · Cited by 611
Hill, M. E. (2002) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3090169 · Cited by 372
Body Objectification and Depression in Adolescents: The Role of Gender, Shame, and Rumination
Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00350.x · Cited by 305
Croes, E. A. J., & Antheunis, M. L. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407520959463 · Cited by 291
“In developing relationships, communication competence encompasses positive social behaviors that reflect one’s ability to integrate thinking, feeling and behavior into a social interaction (Jackson et al., 1995).”
BackgroundBrains or Beauty: How to Engender Trust in User-Agent Interactions
Yuksel, B. F., Collisson, P., & Czerwinski, M. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Internet Technology · doi:10.1145/2998572 · Cited by 63
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 108
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000234922
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
