Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Zoned Bichrome Period in Northwestern Costa Rica

Coe, Michael D., Baudez, Claude F.·1961·American Antiquity

Abstract

In an attempt to establish an archaeological chronology for northwestern Costa Rica, excavations were carried out in 1959-60 in the coastal region and Tempisque River drainage of Guanacaste Province. Four periods have been defined: Zoned Bichrome, Early Polychrome, Middle Polychrome, and Late Polychrome. These are roughly equated in the Maya sequence with Late Formative, Early Classic through the beginning of Late Classic, the latter part of the Late Classic through the early Postclassic, and late Postclassic, respectively. The Zoned Bichrome period has been established on the basis of three geographically separate but coeval phases: Chombo on the Santa Elena Peninsula, Monte Fresco in the Tamarindo Bay zone, and Catalina on the middle Tempisque. All three phases are linked to each other through trade pottery; a radiocarbon date on Monte Fresco is within the first century of the Christian era. Outstanding characteristics of the period are bichrome zoning, dentate rocker-stamping, wavy black lines produced by a multiple brush, engraving, and incising. Considerable fishing and hunting was carried out, and intensive maize agriculture is inferred. These village materials indicate that lower Central America was participating in at least some of the trait diffusion which linked remote areas of Nuclear America in Formative times.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/278738

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Reichel-Dolmatoff, 1956, Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 5, 109
  2. Lothrop, 1926, Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, Contributions, 8
  3. Lothrop, 1959, “Amerikanistische Miszellen,” Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Völkerkunde in Hamburg, 25, 87
  4. Hartman, 1907, Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, 3
  5. Lothrop, 1936, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication, 472
  6. Bosch-Gimpera, 1959, Actes del XXXIII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, 1, 136
  7. Swauger, 1952, American Antiquity, 17, 264
  8. Holmes, 1888, Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology
  9. Porter, 1953, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology
  10. Kidder, 1943, Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, 27
  11. Willey, 1954, Papers of The Peabody Museum, Harvard University, 49
  12. Evans, 1957, American Antiquity, 22, 235
  13. Willey, 1959, Adas del XXXIII Congreso International de Americanistas, 1, 184
  14. Haberland, 1959, Acta Humboldtiana, Series Geographica et Etnographica
  15. Strong, 1957, Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Coe, M. D., & Baudez, C. F.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
1961-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
505-515
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
Cited by
17
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.