Cited by 401Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeological and Geological StudiesLanguage and cultural evolution

Boundary Conditions for Paleolithic Social Systems: A Simulation Approach

Wobst, H. Martin·1974·American Antiquity

Abstract

Pleistocene societies are viewed in this paper as manifestations of band society from which Paleolithic archaeologists can generate hypotheses about this cultural system and against which they can evaluate the validity of general cultural explanations. A general model is posited toward the isolation of Paleolithic societies in the archaeological record. Their numerical size is predicted from Monte Carlo simulations of model populations, and ways are discussed in which distinguishable equilibrium states of such societies can be predicted in time and space. Under the assumption of maximal constraints, simulations are used to predict the size and longevity of social units. The frequency of settlements produced during an equilibrium state of a society is simulated and the utility of survey for activity areas outside the settlements is demonstrated. The models developed in this paper are intended to stimulate deductive research in Paleolithic archaeology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/279579

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Twenty-five has successfully been applied previously to Palaeolithic hunting and gathering groups.

    “twenty-five has successfully been applied previously to Palaeolithic hunting and gathering groups555657.”
  • Twenty-five is recognised as being the most desirable group size for mobile foraging populations in terms of reproductive viability and general adaptive significance to hunting and gathering societies.

    “twenty-five is recognised as being the most desirable group size for mobile foraging populations in terms of reproductive viability and general adaptive significance to hunting and gathering societies545556.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wobst, H. M.
Corresponding author
Wobst, H. Martin
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
1974-04
Volume
39
Issue
2Part1
Pages
147-178
ISSN
  • 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-5064
OpenAlex
W2330955097
Cited by
401
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
32.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
Monte Carlo simulation, population size, archaeological record, equilibrium states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review