The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Anthropological Analysis of Food-Getting Technology.
Abstract
Technology, material culture, and artifacts are unexciting words, yet the ideas for which they stand are of immeasurable importance in the lives of all peoples -- in the past, in the present, and presumably in any future that we may conceive. These key words most often evoke thoughts about the mundane or the highly technical. From another perspective technological achievements may be seen as responsible for many of our ills, and yet it is reasonable to assume that today's technology is underdeveloped in terms of our future needs and desires. Where we have been, what we are, and where we may be going are at least partially embodied in those things that we make and call artifacts.Technology casts such a long shadow over all we do that we cannot begin to imagine living without its products. The ability of people to fashion materials into standardized forms has made it possible for human populations to occupy nearly all of the earth as well as to probe beneath and beyond its surface. The elaboration of skills and the expansion of knowledge required to produce artifacts are undeniably among the most remarkable of all human developments even though we may deplore some of the productions. Distrust of our material heritage exists, at least in part, because we seldom-- if ever --attempt to understand how our artifacts came to be what they are or what future forms and purposes they may assume. An orderly approach to the things that people have made would serve us well, for only then could we begin to appreciate what technology has done for us, as well as to us, within the sweep of time. It would be unfair for me to imply that I can offer a key to what the future holds, but I do hope to impart greater understanding about the future of technology through an analysis of past achievements.This book is an anthropological analysis of technology from its hypothesized beginnings. One primary goal is to offer a means for measuring the complexity of manufactures made by any people, which in turn makes it theoretically possible to assess and compare changes in material culture through all of human time. Why involve ourselves with such concernst Let me state the reasons in brief.All people use objects that they have made. Thus the production of artifacts characterizes every human society and serves as a crucial means of distinguishing people from nearly all other creatures.Of all the information about the pasts of people we have far more data about technology than about any other quality of their culture. Thus, in any attempt to plot changing human lifeways through time, technology serves as a most useful guide.It is accepted as beyond reputable dispute that changes in manufactures are cumulative on a long-range and broad-scale basis. Thus for the study of evolution in culture, technology is the most amenable dimension.All the things that we make today are based on knowledge derived from past achievements. Thus we will not, in fact cannot, produce anything in the immediate future that is not derived from an existing part of our present technological knowledge. It is the technology of the remote and recent past that in a very real sense has led to the artifacts that we now make, and past achievements serve as the essential substratum for the inventions of tomorrow. Whether we like it or not, technology is increasing in importance on a day-to-day basis. We might rejoice in this because it indicates growing human control over the natural world. If, however, one considers this disturbing, one might be well advised to at least know the enemy.All people make objects in order to obtain food. Thus what we eat and how we acquire it are dependent on our technology. The availability of eatables more than anything else establishes the standard of living for a society, and as a result the artifacts devoted to food production may be considered the most critical manufactures in any peoples inventory.In sum the thrust of this book is as follows: All people make things in order to live as humans, and the forms produced have changed through time in an orderly manner. It is worthwhile to analyze these changes so that we may better comprehend the nature of our material past, present, and future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Henrich, J. (2004) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/4128416 · Cited by 1,066
The Origin of Modern Human Behavior: Critique of the Models and Their Test Implications
Henshilwood, C. S., & Marean, C. W. (2003) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/377665 · Cited by 735
Beringia and the global dispersal of modern humans
Hoffecker, J. F., Elias, S. A., O'Rourke, D. H., Scott, G. R., & Bigelow, N. H. (2016) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21478 · Cited by 111
Technological complexity and the global dispersal of modern humans
Hoffecker, J. F., & Hoffecker, I. T. (2017) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.21553 · Cited by 31
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, B., Oswalt, W. H., Mann, G., & Satterthwait, L.
- Venue
- Man
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169
- ISSN
- 0025-1496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W584119098
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Anthropological Analysis of Food-Getting Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2801116
- The paper
- Bender, B., Oswalt, W. H., Mann, G., & Satterthwait, L. (1978). An Anthropological Analysis of Food-Getting Technology. Man. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.