The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Literacy in Theory and Practice
Abstract
Acknowledgements Prolegomenon Introduction Part I. Literacy In Theory: 1. The 'autonomous' model: I. literacy and rationality 2. The 'autonomous' model: II. goody 3. Literacy and linguistics 4. The 'ideological model Part II. Literacy In Theory And Practice: 5. 'Maktab' literacy 6. 'Commercial' literacy Part III. Literacy In Practice: 7. Unesco and radical literacy campaigns 8. Adult literacy campaigns in the UK and the USA Bibliography Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ahearn, L. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 · Cited by 2,083
The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11 · Cited by 1,223
Self-citationInformation and digital literacies: A review of concepts
Bawden, D. (2001) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007083 · Cited by 1,207
Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy
Canagarajah, S. (2011) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/9783110239331.1 · Cited by 984
Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education
Livingstone, S. (2012) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577938 · Cited by 771
“Following the new social literacies approach (Street, 1984), the chapter contributors claimed that ‘printed texts are by nature selective and exclusive .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Searle-Chatterjee, M., & Street, B. V.
- Venue
- Man
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 569
- ISSN
- 0025-1496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W615133973
- Cited by
- 4,966
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 557.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Literacy in Theory and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2802515
- The paper
- Searle-Chatterjee, M., & Street, B. V. (1987). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Man. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
