The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis
Abstract
Morphological typologies of projectile points in North America have often been employed as time-sensitive prehistoric cultural markers. This article demonstrates that the contingencies of point manufacture, hafting, use, and rejuvenation create morphological changes that may render questionable use of these morphological typologies as prehistoric cultural markers. Thirty projectile points were replicated according to the attributes of a commonly employed typological scheme for the Great Basin. Experiments with hafting, impact, and rejuvenation demonstrate that a single point-type may manifest more than one "time-sensitive" shape within its normal uselife.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1954) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1954.56.1.02a00050 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry
Hughes, S. S. (1998) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/bf02428421 · Cited by 360
The Analysis of Stone Tool Procurement, Production, and Maintenance
Andrefsky, W. (2009) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-008-9026-2 · Cited by 317
The Cultural Transmission of Great Basin Projectile-Point Technology I: An Experimental Simulation
Mesoudi, A., & O'Brien, M. J. (2008) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0002731600041263 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Flenniken, J. J., & Raymond, A. W.
- Venue
- American Antiquity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1986-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 603-614
- ISSN
- 0002-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-5064
- OpenAlex
- W1967839324
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/281755
- The paper
- Flenniken, J. J., & Raymond, A. W. (1986). Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis. American Antiquity. https://doi.org/10.2307/281755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.