Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mortal Pots: On Use Life and Vessel Size in the Formation of Ceramic Assemblages

Shott, Michael J.·1996·American Antiquity

Abstract

We know a great deal about how prehistoric pots were made and used but surprisingly little about how long they lasted in service. Vessel use life, however, is an important component of ceramic assemblage formation. A growing body of ethnoarchaeological data shows that the directly measurable “primitive property” of vessel size—in its various dimensions—is positively related to use life and that height and weight are the most reliable predictors of use life. Results offer the provisional prospect of estimating use life of archaeological vessels from their size.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/281835

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results provide insight into the contents of domestic pottery as it was adopted during the Umm an-Nar period, highlighting the importance of re-situating pottery foremost as containers with use-life involved as part of everyday alimentary practices.

    “The results provide insight into the contents of domestic pottery as it was adopted during the Umm an-Nar period, highlighting the importance of re-situating pottery foremost as containers with use-life [146] involved as part of everyday alimentary practices [147], and beyond.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-505980-0.50009-4 · DOI
  2. Deal, 1995, Expanding Archaeology,, 111
  3. 10.1086/jar.44.4.3630505 · DOI
  4. Nelson, 1991, Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology,, 162
  5. Osborn, 1979, La Cerdmica de los Tunebos : Un Estudio Etnologico.
  6. Shott, 1996, Ceramic Vessel Use Life and Size : A Cross-Cultural Study. Manuscript on file, Department of Sociology and Anthropology
  7. Longacre, 1985, Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics,, 334
  8. Pastron, 1974, Ethnoarchaeology,, 93
  9. Mayor, 1991, La Duree de Vie des Ceramiques Africaines : Un Essai de Comprehension des Mecanismes, Bulletin du Centre Genevois d'Anthropologic, 3, 47
  10. Annis, 1984, Ethnoarchaeological Research—Water Vessels in Sardinia, Newsletter of the Department of Pottery Technology, 3, 43
  11. de la Torre, 1982, Houses Built on Scattered Poles : Prehistory and Ecology in Negros Oriental, Philippines,, 117
  12. Graves, 1985, Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics,, 9
  13. 10.2307/278909 · DOI
  14. DeBoer, 1985, Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics,, 347
  15. David, 1972, The Ethnography of Pottery : A Fulani Case Seen in Archaeological Perspective.
  16. 10.1080/00438243.1985.9979967 · DOI
  17. Calder, 1972, Cracked Pots and Rubbish Tips : An Ethnoarchaeological Investigation of Vessel and Sherd Distribution in a Thai-Lao Village.
  18. 10.2307/279592 · DOI
  19. Aldenderfer, 1977, The Computer Simulation of Assemblage Formation Processes : The Evaluation of Multivariate Statistical Methods in Archaeological Research.
  20. Plog, 1985, Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics,, 243
  21. Potter, 1993, Unpacking the Discard Equation. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology
  22. 10.2307/281329 · DOI
  23. Tani, 1994, Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology Expanding Archaeological Method and Theory,, 51
  24. Stanislawski, 1978, Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology,, 201
  25. Bedaux, 1986, Op Zoek Naar Mens en Materiele Cultuur : Feestbundel Aangeboden aan J.D. van der Waals ter Gelegenheid van Zijn Emeritaat,, 117
  26. 10.1017/S0079497X00006332 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1993.tb01033.x · DOI
  28. Rice, 1987, Pottery Analysis : A Sourcebook.
  29. 10.1016/0278-4165(91)90007-K · DOI
  30. Reid, 1989, Pottery Technology : Ideas and Approaches,, 167
  31. 10.2307/278897 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/280512 · DOI
  33. Arnold, 1985, Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process.
  34. Folorunso, 1992, La Poterie du Tiv : Etude Ethnographique a Ushongo., West African Journal of Archaeology, 22, 165
  35. Bedaux, 1987, Aspects of Life-Span of Dogon Pottery., University of Leiden Newsletter of the Department of Pottery Technology, 5, 137
  36. 10.2307/2799808 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/2804177 · DOI
  38. Gamble, 1986, The Palaeolithic Settlement of Europe.
  39. Kurita, 1983, African Study Monographs, 3, 87
  40. Longacre, 1981, Pattern of the Past : Studies in Honour of David Clarke,, 49
  41. 10.1017/CBO9780511598395 · DOI
  42. Norusis, 1988, SPSS/PC+ V2.0 Base Manual for the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2.
  43. Deal, 1983, Pottery Ethnoarchaeology among the Tzeltal Maya.
  44. 10.2307/282143 · DOI
  45. Schiffer, 1987, Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record.
  46. DeBoer, 1979, Ethnoarchaeology : Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology,, 102
  47. Hagstrum, 1989, Technological Continuity and Change : Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology in the Peruvian Andes.
  48. Irwin, 1977, The Emergence of Mailu as a Central Place in the Prehistory of Coastal Papua.
  49. Tani, 1994, On Methods of Measuring Ceramic Use-Life. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology
  50. Nelson, 1985, Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics,, 310
  51. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9274-4 · DOI
  52. 10.2307/276647 · DOI
  53. Hayden, 1984, The Structure of Material Systems : Ethnoarchaeology in the Maya Highlands.
  54. Weigand, 1969, Mesoamerican Studies. Research Records.
  55. Neupert, 1994, Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology : Expanding Archaeological Method and Theory,, 71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shott, M. J.
Venue
American Antiquity
Published
1996-07
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
463-482
ISSN
  • 0002-7316
  • 2325-5064
Cited by
56
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review