Cited by 99Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsHydrology and Drought AnalysisEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Temporal variation in actual evapotranspiration of terrestrial ecosystems: Patterns and ecological implications

Frank, Douglas A., Inouye, Richard S.·1994·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

Douglas A. Frank, Richard S. Inouye, Temporal Variation in Actual Evapotranspiration of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Patterns and Ecological Implications, Journal of Biogeography, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Jul., 1994), pp. 401-411

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2845758

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Frank, D. A., & Inouye, R. S.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
401
ISSN
0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319146734
Cited by
99
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Biogeography (publishedVersion)
Funders
Idaho State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
actual evapotranspiration, temporal variation, terrestrial ecosystems, water balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review