CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Renaissance and Early Modern StudiesRenaissance Literature and CultureItalian Literature and Culture

: De Arte Poetica.

Bongiorno, Andrew·1978·Renaissance Quarterly
DOI 10.2307/2860345
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Marco Girolamo Vida. De Arte Poetica. Translated with commentary and with the text of ca. 1517. Ed. Ralph G. Williams. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976. lii+299 pp. $20. - Marco Girolamo Vida. Scacchia Ludus. With English verse translation and the texts of three earlier versions. Ed. with intro. and notes by Mario A. di Cesare. Nieuwkoop: B. De Graaf, 1975. 112 pp. Hfl.48. - Volume 31 Issue 1

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2860345

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Related

Authors
Bongiorno, A.
Corresponding author
Bongiorno, Andrew
Venue
Renaissance Quarterly
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1978-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
87-90
ISSN
  • 0034-4338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-0236
DOI
10.2307/2860345
OpenAlex
W2325547347
Semantic Scholar
d1e722d767e150d5cf96311c0fdbb15cd3f94c85
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 14843 d)
Locations
Renaissance Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Renaissance Literature and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Italian Literature and Culture
Keywords
De arte poetica, Italian Renaissance poetry, Italian humanism, poetics, English translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review