The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simple Methods for Calculating Age‐Based Life History Parameters for Stage‐Structured Populations: Ecological Archives M062-002
Abstract
Stage—classified matrix models are important analytical and theoretical tools for the study of population dynamics; in particular, these models may be appropriate for populations in which survivorship and fecundity are dependent on size or developmental stage, populations in which the age of individuals is difficult to determine, and populations in which there are multiple types of newborns. Nevertheless, methods for analyzing the implications of a population's stage—transition matrix have been limited in comparison to methods available for age—structured models (life tables or Leslie matrices). In this paper we show that all of the standard age—based measures of life history traits can be derived from a stage—transition model. By decomposing the transition matrix into separate birth, survival, and fission matrices we derive simple, direct formulas for age—based life history traits such as the discrete survivorship function, l x, maternity function, f x, mean age at maturity, and net reproductive rate, R o, and also population parameters, including the stable age distribution, age—specific reproductive value, and generation time. These provide a common set of parameters for comparing age—structured and stage—structured populations or comparing populations with differently structured life cycles. In addition, we define four measures of age and life—span that summarize the relationship between stage and age in a stage—structured population: age distribution and mean age of residence for each stage class, expected remaining life—span for individuals in each stage class, and total life—span conditional on reaching a given stage class. We illustrate the use of our methods to address specific ecological questions by applying them to several previously published demographic data sets. These questions include: (1) what are the demographic effects of crowding on the tropical palm Astrocaryum mexicanum?; (2) how important is the initial rosette size in determining life history of teasel, Dipsacus sylvestris?; and (3) how old are reproducing adults in a stage—classified population of pink lady's—slipper, Cypripedium acaule? Our results may also be useful for evaluating the adequacy of a given stage—transition model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Cited by
A COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF PLANTS BASED UPON ELASTICITIES OF VITAL RATES
Franco, M., & Silvertown, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0651 · Cited by 371
Mortality Implications of Mortality Plateaus
Missov, T. I., & Vaupel, J. W. (2015) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/130912992 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochran, M. E., & Ellner, S.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-364
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2012558510
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple Methods for Calculating Age‐Based Life History Parameters for Stage‐Structured Populations: Ecological Archives M062-002. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937115
- The paper
- Cochran, M. E., & Ellner, S. (1992). Simple Methods for Calculating Age‐Based Life History Parameters for Stage‐Structured Populations: Ecological Archives M062-002. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.