The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications
Abstract
Forests exhibit much variation in light environments, and this can affect communication among animals, communication between animals and plants, photosynthesis, and plant morphogenesis. Light environments are caused by, and can be predicted from, the geometry of the light paths, the weather conditions, and the time of day. The structure of forests leads to four major light habitats when the sun is not blocked by clouds: forest shade, woodland shade, small gaps, and large gaps. These are characterized by yellow—green, blue—gray, reddish, and "white" ambient light spectra, respectively. When the sun is blocked by clouds, the spectra of these four habitats converge on that of large gaps and open areas, so the single light environment during cloudy weather will be called open/cloudy. An additional light environment (early/late) is associated with low sun angles (near dawn or dusk); it is purplish. Each light environment is well defined and was found in forests of Trinidad, Panama, Costa Rica, Australia, California, and Florida. Scattered literature references suggest similar patterns elsewhere in North America, Europe, and Java. Perceived colors of animals, flowers, and fruits depend upon the interaction between ambient light color and the reflectance color of the animal or plant parts. As a result, an animal or plant may have a different appearance in each environment, i.e., a color pattern may be relatively cryptic in some light environments while relatively conspicuous in others. This has strong implications for the joint evolution of visual signals and vision, as well as microhabitat choice. Plant growth and form may also be affected by variation in the color of forest light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers
McCoy, D. E., Feo, T., Harvey, T. A., & Prum, R. O. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w · Cited by 7,424
Predicting and managing light in the understory of boreal forests
Lieffers, V. J., Messier, C., Stadt, K. J., Gendron, F., & Comeau, P. G. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-29-6-796 · Cited by 367
Endler, J. A., Westcott, D. A., Madden, J. R., & Robson, T. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01827.x · Cited by 284
Self-citationVeilleux, C. C., Louis, E. E., & Bolnick, D. A. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst058 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Endler, J. A.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W2044206835
- Cited by
- 1,251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937121
- The paper
- Endler, J. A. (1993). The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.