The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refuges, Biological Disturbance, and Rocky Subtidal Community Structure in New England
Abstract
The effects of two sources of biological disturbance–predation and sea urchin grazing–on the structure of benthic communities inside and outside beds of the horse mussel, Modiolus modiolus, were examined in the rocky subtidal zone off the Isles of Shoals, New Hampshire, USA. Multivariate analysis revealed three major communities between 8 and 30 m in depth: (1) a Modiolus community; (2) a 30 m community; and (3) an 8—18 m community. At all depths, mussel beds contained significantly higher densities of infauna than did other subtidal habitats. The hypothesis that Modiolus beds provide a refuge from predation for the associated community was tested in five manipulative field experiments. Three members of the mussel bed community, the bivalve Hiatella arctica, the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, and the ophiuroid Ophiopholis aculeata, were used as experimental prey. Consumption of these prey by a guild of generalist predators was observed outside but not inside mussel beds, which indicates that subtidal Modiolus beds provide a spatial refuge from predation. Deaths from predation were significantly higher at night than during the day for Hiatella but not for Strongylocentrotus. At night, crab (Cancer borealis, Cancer irroratus) and lobster (Homarus americanus) predation accounted for all attacks that were directly witnessed, while fish (Tautoglabrus adspersus, Pseudopleuronectes americanus) predation accounted for 71% of the total prey consumed during the day. Such diel differences in predation corresponded with predator abundance patterns. The sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis was the most significant agent of biological disturbance during the 1979—1984 study period. Strongylocentrotus intensively grazed the benthos at 8 m in 1982, causing a 79% reduction (from predisturbance levels) in the mean population density of invertebrates outside the mussel beds. This event served as a natural experiment in which to test the hypothesis that Modiolus beds function as a refuge from severe grazing disturbance. Re—sampling of communities inside and outside mussel beds immediately after the grazing disturbance indicated that the Modiolus community exhibited less change in species composition, dominance, and diversity than communities outside the mussel beds. Such comparisons indicate that Modiolus beds afford protection from severe grazing disturbance for infaunal invertebrates. Long—term photographic monitoring of marked mussel beds at 8, 18, and 30 m depth showed that Modiolus beds at all depths persisted for more than 5 yr. Mortality rates of adult Modiolus were low; however, mortality was highest at the shallow site (8 m). Mussel beds successfully resisted the grazing disturbance which eliminated all other biogenic habitats except those created by crustose coralline algae. Modiolus beds are effective refuges because they persist for many years and resist biotic disturbance. In the subtidal communities examined here, lower levels of disturbance inside mussel beds can account for the abundance and spatial distribution of Modiolus—community species. These results demonstrate the functional significance of mussel beds in cold—temperate subtidal regions where predation and sea urchin grazing are major determinants of community organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 1×
“Dis turbance is used here to mean any process that removes biomass (Grime 1977); biological disturbance refers to the effects of grazing and predation (Dayton 1971).”
Cited by
Harris, L. G., & Tyrrell, M. C. (2001) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1011487219735 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Witman, J. D.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-445
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W1989309816
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refuges, Biological Disturbance, and Rocky Subtidal Community Structure in New England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937130
- The paper
- Witman, J. D. (1985). Refuges, Biological Disturbance, and Rocky Subtidal Community Structure in New England. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.