Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 754

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal Succession in a Desert Stream Ecosystem Following Flash Flooding

Fisher, Stuart G., Gray, Lawrence J., Grimm, Nancy B., Busch, David E.·1982·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Recovery of a desert stream after an intense flash flooding event is described as a model of temporal succession in lotic ecosystems. A late summer flood in Sycamore Creek, Arizona, virtually eliminated algae and reduced invertebrate standing crop by 98%. Physical and morphometric conditions typical of the preflood period were restored in 2 d and the biota recovered in 2—3 wk. Algal communities responded rapidly and achieved a standing crop of nearly 100 g/m 2 in 2 wk. Community composition was dominated by diatoms early in succession and by filamentous greens and blue—greens later. Macroinvertebrates also recolonized denuded substrates rapidly, largely by immigration of aerial adults and subsequent oviposition. Growth and development were rapid and several generations of the dominant mayfly and dipteran taxa were completed during the 1st mo of recovery. Invertebrate dry biomass reached 7.3 g/m 2 in 1 mo. Gross primary production (P g) measured as O 2 increased in a similar asymptotic fashion and reached 6.6 g°m—2°d—1 in 30 d. P g exceeded community respiration (R) after day 5 and P g/R averaged 1.46 for the remainder of the 2—mo sequence. This ecosystem is thus autotrophic and exports organic matter downstream and by drying, laterally. Uptake of nitrate and phosphorus were proportional to net primary production and exhibited a marked downstream decline in concentration during both light and dark periods. Temporal trajectories of various community and ecosystem attributes are compared with those suggested by Odum (1969) to be diagnostic of successional status. Agreement was poor in attributes which are especially modified in open, frequently disturbed ecosystems such as streams.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2937346

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 754

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, S. G., Gray, L. J., Grimm, N. B., & Busch, D. E.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-03
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
93-110
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2007131168
Cited by
754
References
1
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Succession in a Desert Stream Ecosystem Following Flash Flooding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937346
The paper
Fisher, S. G., Gray, L. J., Grimm, N. B., & Busch, D. E. (1982). Temporal Succession in a Desert Stream Ecosystem Following Flash Flooding. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.