Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 618

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Community Development and Persistence in a Low Rocky Intertidal Zone

Lubchenco, Jane, Menge, Bruce A.·1978·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

This paper analyzes the factors controlling the development and persistence of patterns of distribution, abundance, and diversity of space users in the low rocky intertidal zone of New England. The spatial structure of this community changes along a wave exposure gradient. Mussels (Mytilus edulis) dominate at headlands exposed to wave shock, the alga Chondrus crispus (Irish moss) dominates at sites protected from wave shock, and both are abundant at areas intermediate in exposure to waves. Using a combination of experiments (exclosures, enclosures, removals) and observations, we evaluated the effects of several factors on this system, including (1) predation, (2) herbivory, (3) plant—plant competition, (4) plant—animal competition, and (5) physical disturbance from high—energy waves. The interaction having the greatest effect on the structure of this low zone association was predation. At protected sites, the starfish Asterias forbesi, Asterias vulgaris, and the snail Thais lapillus prey heavily on Mytilus, which is the functionally dominant competitor in the low (and mid) zone(s). When secondary succession is initiated by removal of all erect animals and plants, community development in the absence of these predators (predator exclusion) results in competitive elimination of both the barnacle Balanus balanoides and Chondrus by Mytilus. A similar result occurs if predators are excluded from unaltered stands of Chondrus. Controls in these experiments (i.e., with predators present) usually either developed to, or remained as stands of Chondrus. At intermediate sites, patches of Mytilus occassionally escaped from predation, suggesting predation intensity is patchy in space and time. Persistence of Chondrus is thus a by—product of the activities of predators at protected sites. At exposed sites, predators do not control the mussels. As a consequence, Mytilus outcompetes Chondrus and Balanus for space and achieves structural dominance. Periwinkle abundance decreases, and abundance and seasonality of ephemeral algae increase with increasing wave shock. Results of manipulations during both primary and secondary succession indicate that Littorina littorea, the only large, abundant herbivore in the low zone, has no direct effect on perennating (regrowing vegetatively) or established Chondrus, or on its extensive, encrusting holdfast. However, this periwinkle exerts an important indirect effect by consuming seasonally abundant ephemeral algae, which slow the rate of succession by suppressing growth of Chondrus. Once Chondrus is established, L. littorea damps variations in its abundance by cropping epiphytic ephemeral algae. The role of other herbivores seems negligible. Experiments show that limpets and sea urchins potentially could control Chondrus (and its holdfast), but they are normally too scarce to have a detectable effect on the algae. Chondrus thus monopolizes space at protected areas because (1) its competitors (mussels and epiphytic ephemeral algae) are removed by their consumers (predators and herbivores), (2) it has escaped control by herbivores, and (3) it can outcompete other perennial algae by virtue of its ability to perennate, and thus maintain its occupancy of space. The organization of this portion of the New England rocky intertidal region is thus similar in important ways to that of the mid zone (Menge 1975, 1976). Predation intensity, at least partly a function of wave shock, is great at relatively protected sites and determines the observed structural pattern (domination of space by algae). Since consumers are ineffective in controlling prey at exposed sites, mussels outcompete other space users and monopolize space on the shore. Thus, predators apparently determine the "trajectory" followed during succession. The persistence of algae is strongly dependent on the removal of mussels by predators. Herbivores, though ineffective in controlling the structurally dominant perennial algae, control the abundance of ephemeral algae and hence both determine the rate at which a Chondrus bed develops and stablize established beds of Irish moss by reducing variability in its abundance. Thus, herbivores evidently control the rate of community development (succession) and enhance the persistence of this alga. Disturbance from wave shock seems to operate in a fashion similar to both types of consumers by removing mussels and ephemeral algae. However, this sort of removal tends to be more catastrophic, frequently clearing large areas of space and initiating secondary succession, especially at exposed sites. The role of disturbance is thus largely that of inducing, rather than suppressing, variability in this system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2937360

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 618

Metadata

Authors
Lubchenco, J., & Menge, B. A.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
67-94
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W1980255625
Cited by
618
References
0
FWCI
16.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Development and Persistence in a Low Rocky Intertidal Zone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2937360
The paper
Lubchenco, J., & Menge, B. A. (1978). Community Development and Persistence in a Low Rocky Intertidal Zone. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937360

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.