The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade
Abstract
We analyze the effects of alliances and preferential trading arrangements on bilateral trade flows. Both factors are likely to promote trade among members, but we argue that the interaction between them is central to explaining patterns of commerce. The combination of an alliance, which creates political incentives for participants to engage in trade, and a commercial institution, which liberalizes trade among members, is expected to provide a considerable impetus to commerce among parties to both. The results of our quantitative analyses support these arguments. Both alliances and preferential trading arrangements strongly affected trade from 1960 to 1990, and allies that included a major power conducted considerably more trade than their nonmajor-power counterparts. Moreover, the interaction between alliances and preferential trading arrangements is fundamental to explaining patterns of bilateral commerce: Parties to a common preferential trading arrangement and a common alliance engage in markedly greater trade than do members of either type of institution but not both.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Mansfield, E. D. (1995) · doi:10.1515/9780691223018 · Cited by 240
Self-citation
Cited by
Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899551002 · Cited by 567
Self-citationInvesting in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict
Gartzke, E., Li, Q., & Boehmer, C. (2001) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/00208180151140612 · Cited by 554
Space Is More than Geography: Using Spatial Econometrics in the Study of Political Economy
BECK, N., GLEDITSCH, K. S., & BEARDSLEY, K. (2006) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00391.x · Cited by 485
Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict
Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2000) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081800551361 · Cited by 384
Self-citationThrowing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (2001) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/00208180151140658 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansfield, E. D., & Bronson, R.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-107
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2026016853
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2952261
- The paper
- Mansfield, E. D., & Bronson, R. (1997). Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.