Tapir-Generated Seed Shadows: Scale-Dependent Patchiness in the Amazon Rain Forest
Abstract
1 Maximiliana maripa is a large seeded palm that occurs in monodominant patches (clumps) in the Amazonian forest of Maraca Island, Roraima, Brazil. 2 Rodents, collared peccaries (Tayassu tajacu), deer (Odocoileus virginianus and Mazama spp.) and primates, all short-distance, small-to-medium bodied dispersers, ate the pulp of Maximiliana fruits and spat out intact seeds, from 97 to 100% of them within 5 m of parent plants (below the tree crown). 3 Tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) swallowed entire fruits and defecated intact seeds at latrines located up to 2 km from the nearest palm clump, creating a large-scale, punctuated seed shadow. 4 Bruchid beetle (Pachymeris cardo) larvae killed 77% of seeds remaining near parent trees, but only 0.7% of the 6140 seeds dispersed by tapirs to latrines. 5 Densities of zero-year seedlings to fifth-year saplings were significantly higher at tapir latrine sites than around parent trees located in conspecific aggregations; they were also significantly higher for the zero and one year classes at latrines than at randomly selected nonpalm, nonlatrine control trees. 6 Seeds dispersed by tapirs to latrines and secondarily dispersed by rodents gave rise to the seedlings and saplings located around the latrine sites, while seeds secondarily dispersed by rodents gave rise to the seedlings and saplings around control trees. 7 Collared (Tayassu tajacu) and white-lipped (T. pecati) peccaries accounted for high seedling and sapling mortality around parent tree…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tapirs, peccaries, wild pigs, deer, duikers and larger rodents are among the most active seed dispersers or predators; a significant change in their population densities will have a major effect on seedling survival and forest regeneration.
“Tapirs, peccaries, wild pigs, deer, duikers and the larger rodents are among the most active seed dispersers or predators; thus a significant change in their population densities will have a major effect on seedling survival and forest regeneration (Beck 2005, Bodmer 1991, Fragoso 1997).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Fragoso 1997
The disappearance or extreme reduction of populations of keystone species, ecosystem engineers, or other important species is expected to have a disproportionate impact on the ecosystem compared to the loss of other species.
“The disappearance, or even extreme reduction, of populations of 'keystone species', 'ecosystem engineers', or other species or groups of importance in ecological communities is expected to have a disproportionate impact on the ecosystem compared to the loss of other species (Campos-Arceiz and Blake 2011, Fragoso 1997, Keuroghlian andEaton 2009).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Fragoso 1997
Elephants, tapirs, and peccaries can play major roles in modifying vegetation structure, composition and dynamics through their feeding habits and movements in the forest.
“Elephants (Campos-Arceiz and Blake 2011), but also ungulates such as tapirs and peccaries (Beck 2006, Fragoso 1997, Keuroghlian and Eaton 2009), can play major roles in modifying vegetation structure, composition and dynamic through their feeding habits and movements in the forest.”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Fragoso 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Stevenson, P. R., & Guzmán‐Caro, D. C. (2010) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.20852 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Animal‐mediated seed dispersal: A review of study methods
Beckman, N. G., Kuprewicz, E. K., Borah, B., Bullock, J. M., Gallinat, A. S., González‐Varo, J. P., Jain, A., Lim, J. Y., Motta, C. I., Nevo, O., et al. (2026) · Applications in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1002/aps3.70043 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fragoso, J. M. V.
- Venue
- The Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 519
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001090951
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- seed dispersal, seed shadow, seedling mortality, Tayassu tajacu, white-lipped peccary, seedling recruitment, Amazon rainforest, Maracá Island
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review