Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation

Neyman, J., Iwaszkiewicz, K., Kołodziejczyk, St.·1935·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

DOI 10.2307/2983637

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2983637

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293
Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858 · Cited by 2,395
Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, Decisions
Rubin, D. B. (2005) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214504000001880 · Cited by 2,173
THE ESTIMATION OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM OBSERVATIONAL DATA
Winship, C., & Morgan, S. L. (1999) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.659 · Cited by 890
Formal mode of statistical inference for causal effects
Rubin, D. B. (1990) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(90)90077-8 · Cited by 483
A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Stepin, I., Alonso, J. M., Catala, A., & Pereira-Farina, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3051315 · Cited by 376
“…relate to either of the four theoretical milestones: Lewis-Stalnaker’s theory of closest possible worlds [36], [120], Pearl’s Structural Causal Models (SCM) [37], Wood-ward’s Counterfactual Theory of Explanation (CTE) [125], or the Neyman-Rubin Causal Model (NRCM) [107], [115] (see Table 5).”
Background
Causal inference with observational data
Nichols, A. (2007) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0800700403 · Cited by 339
Average Values of Mean Squares in Factorials
Cornfield, J., & Tukey, J. W. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728067 · Cited by 292
General Forms of Finite Population Central Limit Theorems with Applications to Causal Inference
Li, X., & Ding, P. (2017) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1295865 · Cited by 167
Controversies concerning randomization and additivity in clinical trials.
Senn, S. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2074 · Cited by 132
Covariate-adjusted Fisher randomization tests for the average treatment effect
Zhao, A., & Ding, P. (2021) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.04.007 · Cited by 40
Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies
van Smeden, M., Penning de Vries, B. B. L., Nab, L., & Groenwold, R. H. H. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.006 · Cited by 32

Authors: Neyman, J., Iwaszkiewicz, K., & Kołodziejczyk, S.
Venue: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published: 1935-07-01
Volume: 2
Issue: 2
Pages: 107-154
ISSN: 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
1467-9868
DOI: 10.2307/2983637
OpenAlex: W2803021103
Cited by: 485
References: 0
FWCI: 0.00
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review