Cited by 483Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Formal mode of statistical inference for causal effects

Rubin, Donald B.·1990·Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-3758(90)90077-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Achilles heel of survey methodology is its inability to escape the problems of selection that plague research in this field.

    “The Achilles heel of the survey methodology is its inability to escape from the glaring problems of selection that plague research in this field (see Winship and Morgan 1999; Rubin 1990; Heckman et al. 1998).”

    From The Mark of a Criminal Record (2003) · cites this paper as Rubin 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubin, D. B.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rubin, Donald B.
Venue
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
279-292
ISSN
0378-3758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978125212
Cited by
483
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
synthetic control method, treatment effect estimation, counterfactual prediction, nonparametric inference, average treatment effect, regret bounds, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review