The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping
Abstract
The problem discussed in this paper is to determine whether statistics given for each county in a country are distributed at random or whether they form a pattern. The statistical instrument is the contiguity ratio c defined by formula (1.1) below, which is an obvious generalization of the Von Neumann (1941) ratio used in one-dimensional analysis, particularly time series. While the applications in the paper are confined to oneand two-dimensional problems, it is evident that the theory applies to any number of dimensions. If the figures for adjoining counties are generally closer than those for counties not adjoining, the ratio will clearly tend to be less than unity. The constants are such that when the statistics are distributed at random in the counties, the average value of the ratio is unity. The statistics will be regarded as contiguous if the actual ratio found is significantly less than unity, by reference to the standard error. The theory is discussed from the viewpoints of both randomization and classical theory. With the randomization approach, the observations themselves are the universe and no assumption need be made as to the character of the frequency distribution. In the normal case, the assumption is that the observations may be regarded as a random sample from a universe. In this case it seems certain that the ratio tends very rapidly to normality as the number of counties increases. The exact values of the first four semi-invariants are given for the case. These functions depend only on the configuration, and the calculated values for Ireland, with number of counties only 26, show that the distribution of the ratio is very close to normal. Accordingly, one can have confidence in deciding on significance from the standard error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zwanenburg, A., Vallières, M., Abdalah, M. A., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Andrearczyk, V., Apte, A., Ashrafinia, S., Bakas, S., Beukinga, R. J., Boellaard, R., et al. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191145 · Cited by 4,177
Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists
Fortin, M.-J., & Dale, M. R. T. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542039 · Cited by 991
Spatial data analysis: theory and practice
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3486 · Cited by 965
A Python library for probabilistic analysis of single-cell omics data
Gayoso, A., Lopez, R., Xing, G., Boyeau, P., Valiollah Pour Amiri, V., Hong, J., Wu, K., Jayasuriya, M., Mehlman, E., Langevin, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01206-w · Cited by 789
SOKAL, R. R., & ODEN, N. L. (1978) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00014.x · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Geary, R. C.
- Venue
- The Incorporated Statistician
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1954-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 115
- ISSN
- 1466-9404 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2399767476
- Cited by
- 1,590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2986645
- The paper
- Geary, R. C. (1954). The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping. The Incorporated Statistician. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.