CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 991

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists

Fortin, Marie-Josée, Dale, Mark R. T.·2005
DOI 10.1017/cbo9780511542039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The spatial and temporal dimensions of ecological phenomena have always been inherent in the conceptual framework of ecology, but only recently have they been incorporated explicitly into ecological theory, sampling design, experimental design and models. Statistical techniques for spatial analysis of ecological data are burgeoning and many ecologists are unfamiliar with what is available and how the techniques should be used correctly. This book gives an overview of the wide range of spatial statistics available to analyse ecological data, and provides advice and guidance for graduate students and practising researchers who are either about to embark on spatial analysis in ecological studies or who have started but are unsure how to proceed. Only a basic understanding of statistics is assumed and many schematic illustrations are given to complement or replace mathematical technicalities, making the book accessible to ecologists wishing to enter this important and fast-growing field for the first time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511542039

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delaunay triangulation produces a sparse initial model by reducing links to only those corresponding geometrically with the edges of a minimal triangulation.

    “Delaunay triangulation produces a sparse initial model (Fig. 5) by reducing the links to only those that correspond geometrically with the edges of a minimal triangulation”

    From Exploratory network reconstruction with sparse archaeological data and XTENT (2022) · cites this paper as Fortin and Dale, 2005

  • The Gabriel Graph minimises the spatial density of connected nodes and produces even sparser results than a Delaunay triangulation.

    “The Gabriel Graph is a model that minimises the spatial density of connected nodes.It does not require any parameters and produces even sparser results than a Delaunay triangulation.”

    From Exploratory network reconstruction with sparse archaeological data and XTENT (2022) · cites this paper as Fortin and Dale, 2005

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 379

  1. 10.2307/1937542 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.114.2961.315 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1985.tb00849.x · DOI
  4. Stoyan, D., Kendall, W. S. & Mecke, J. (1995). Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. New York: Wiley. (Cited on page 105)
  5. 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682557 · DOI
  6. Yarranton, 1966, A plotless method of sampling vegetation, Journal of Ecology, 59, 224
  7. 10.1023/A:1022995922992 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0034-4257(87)90015-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/1467-9469.00165 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/1938740 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/2413122 · DOI
  12. Tavaré, 1983, Serial dependence in contingency tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 45, 100, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01236.x · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00279-X · DOI
  14. 10.2307/2389612 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80628-9 · DOI
  16. Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H. & O'Neill, R. V. (2003). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York: Springer-Verlag. (Cited on page 176)
  17. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb00350.x · DOI
  18. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/BF02114085 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00526.x · DOI
  21. 10.2307/3236457 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/143141 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0031-3203(80)90066-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/biomet/41.3-4.434 · DOI
  25. Upton, G. J. G. & Fingleton, B. (1985). Spatial Data Analysis by Example, vol. I: Point Pattern and Quantitative Data. New York: Wiley. (Cited on pages 1, 34, 36, 44, 62, 233, 241)
  26. 10.2307/1938526 · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00715.x · DOI
  28. 10.1093/biomet/70.1.139 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/2261363 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/2259308 · DOI
  31. Reich, 1997, Application of permutation procedures for comparing multi-species point patterns of grassland plants, Grassland Science, 43, 189
  32. Upton, G. J. G. & Fingleton, B. (1989). Spatial Data Analysis by Example, vol. II: Categorical and Directional Data. New York: Wiley. (Cited on pages 234, 274, 276)
  33. 10.1016/0168-1699(96)00005-1 · DOI
  34. 10.1086/285332 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/BF02447515 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/1939170 · DOI
  37. O'Sullivan, D. & Unwin, D. (2003). Geographic Information Analysis. New Jersey: Wiley. (Cited on pages 1, 146, 160)
  38. 10.2307/1943058 · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00193.x · DOI
  40. 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0981:SAADTW]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/BF02087112 · DOI
  42. 10.1023/A:1007986410048 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/3545809 · DOI
  44. Okabe, 2001, The K-function method on a network and its computational implementation, Geographical Analysis, 33, 270, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00448.x · DOI
  45. 10.1093/ee/24.5.1032 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0167-9473(95)00007-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01671-L · DOI
  48. 10.2307/3544849 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/BF02621410 · DOI
  50. 10.2307/2413120 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1978.tb00013.x · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00045-4 · DOI
  53. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.22057.x · DOI
  54. Moran, 1948, The interpretation of statistical maps, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 10, 243, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x · DOI
  55. 10.2307/4003522 · DOI
  56. Schroeder, M. (1991). Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. New York: Freeman. (Cited on pages 305, 307)
  57. Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer-Verlag. (Cited on page 29)
  58. 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0126 · DOI
  59. 10.1046/j.1365-2907.1998.00028.x · DOI
  60. 10.1007/BF00045028 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1993.tb00301.x · DOI
  62. 10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09942.x · DOI
  63. 10.2307/2937096 · DOI
  64. Renshaw, 1984, The description of spatial pattern using two-dimensional spectral analysis, Vegetatio, 56, 75, 10.1007/BF00033049 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/BF00384935 · DOI
  66. Sokal, 1983, A test of spatial autocorrelation using an isolation-by-distance model, Genetics, 105, 219, 10.1093/genetics/105.1.219 · DOI
  67. 10.2307/1218190 · DOI
  68. Turchin, P. (1998). Quantitative Analysis of Movement. Sunderland: Sinauer. (Cited on pages 276, 277, 284, 289)
  69. Ripley, B. D. (1981). Spatial Processes. New York: Wiley. (Cited on pages 1, 2, 233)
  70. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00472.x · DOI
  71. 10.1007/978-94-011-4010-2 · DOI
  72. 10.2307/1941774 · DOI
  73. Ludwig, J. A. & Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology. New York: Wiley. (Cited on page 83)
  74. 10.1007/BF00048036 · DOI
  75. Johnston, C. A., Pastor, J. & Pinay, G. (1992). Quantitative methods for studying landscape boundaries, In Landscape Boundaries, eds. A. J. Hansen & F. di Castri, pp. 107–25. New York: Springer-Verlag. (Cited on page 187)
  76. Peters, V. S. (2003). Keystone processes affect succession in boreal mixed woods: the relationship between masting in white spruce and fire history. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Alberta. (Cited on page 302)
  77. 10.2307/5386 · DOI
  78. Manly, B. F. J. (1997). Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall. (Cited on pages 1, 26, 28, 29, 35, 41, 149, 239, 242, 285, 326, 327)
  79. 10.1007/BF00141298 · DOI
  80. Krige, 1966, Two-dimensional weighted moving average trend surfaces for ore-evaluation, Journal of the South Africa Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 66, 13
  81. 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00074-R · DOI
  82. 10.1016/0304-3800(93)90082-4 · DOI
  83. 10.1098/rspb.1994.0118 · DOI
  84. 10.1080/01431160050110179 · DOI
  85. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C. & Charlton, M. (2000). Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications. (Cited on pages 1, 29, 154)
  86. Wakefield, J. C., Kelsall, J. E. & Morris, S. E. (2000). Clustering, cluster detection, and spatial variation in risk. In Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications, eds. P. Elliott, J. C. Wakefield, N. G. Best & D. J. Briggs, pp. 128–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Cited on pages 266, 267)
  87. 10.1139/x97-156 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00127.x · DOI
  89. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00235.x · DOI
  90. Getis, A. & Boots, B. (1978). Models of Spatial Processes: An Approach to the Study of Point, Line and Area Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited on pages 1, 29)
  91. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00931.x · DOI
  92. 10.2307/3237159 · DOI
  93. Millspaugh, 1998, Some comments on spatial independence in studies of resource selection, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26, 232
  94. 10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00969.x · DOI
  96. Krebs, C. J. (2002). Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance: Hands-On Field Package, 5th edn. San Francisco, CA: Prentice Hall. (Cited on pages 25, 300)
  97. 10.1080/014311698214983 · DOI
  98. 10.1068/a231269 · DOI
  99. 10.2307/1939928 · DOI
  100. 10.4141/S02-010 · DOI
  101. 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0936 · DOI
  102. 10.1007/978-1-4615-9686-8 · DOI
  103. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00156.x · DOI
  104. 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682547 · DOI
  105. 10.2307/3236855 · DOI
  106. 10.1007/978-3-662-05294-5 · DOI
  107. 10.2307/2960573 · DOI
  108. Frost, 1988, Development of microstructure in thin films, Proceedings of SPIE, The International Society for Optical Engineering, 821, 77
  109. 10.2307/1400362 · DOI
  110. 10.1007/BF00377373 · DOI
  111. 10.3406/spgeo.1992.3091 · DOI
  112. Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press. (Cited on pages 132, 137, 138, 160, 169, 170) · DOI
  113. 10.1007/BF00569362 · DOI
  114. Noy-Meir, I. & Anderson, D. (1971). Multiple pattern analysis or multiscale ordination: towards a vegetation hologram. In Statistical Ecology, vol. 3: Populations, Ecosystems, and Systems Analysis, eds. G. P. Patil, E. C. Pielou & W. E. Waters, pp. 207–32. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. (Cited on page 89)
  115. 10.2307/3545921 · DOI
  116. 10.1007/BF00379695 · DOI · Paper page
  117. 10.2307/3236998 · DOI
  118. Cliff, A. D. & Ord, J. K. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. London: Pion. (Cited on pages 1, 119, 120, 124, 126)
  119. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1988.tb00174.x · DOI
  120. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0437 · DOI
  121. Brodo, I. M., Sharnoff, S. D. & Sharnoff, S. (2001). Lichens of North America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Cited on page 293)
  122. 10.2307/3236238 · DOI
  123. 10.2307/3545584 · DOI
  124. 10.1090/psapm/047 · DOI
  125. Stoyan, 2000, Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics, Statistical Science, 15, 61
  126. Dale, M. R. T. (1999). Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited on pages ⅺ, 1, 25, 33, 75, 76, 82, 84, 85, 88, 90, 91, 97, 247, 266, 329)
  127. 10.1139/b97-846 · DOI
  128. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00378.x · DOI
  129. 10.1007/BF02083652 · DOI
  130. 10.2307/3236174 · DOI
  131. 10.2307/3237046 · DOI
  132. Cliff, A. D. & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion. (Cited on pages 1, 29, 118, 120, 124, 126, 131, 220, 264)
  133. 10.1890/0012-9615(2001)071[0277:ECACDI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  134. 10.2307/3236071 · DOI
  135. Dale, 1993, Markov models of spatial dependence in vegetation, Coenoses, 8, 21
  136. White, G. C. & Garrott, R. A. (1990). Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data. New York: Academic Press. (Cited on page 287)
  137. 10.1002/ajpa.1330760308 · DOI
  138. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6465-9 · DOI
  139. 10.2307/3565535 · DOI
  140. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12447.x · DOI
  141. 10.2307/2532039 · DOI
  142. 10.1038/294240a0 · DOI
  143. 10.1002/9780470316993 · DOI
  144. Burrough, P. A. & McDonnell, R. A. (1998). Principles of Geographical Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Cited on pages 17, 181, 182, 184, 320)
  145. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084076 · DOI
  146. Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular Statistics in Biology. London: Academic Press. (Cited on page 276)
  147. 10.2307/2533962 · DOI
  148. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1987:DOASPT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  149. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2158 · DOI
  150. 10.2307/2986645 · DOI
  151. 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.5461 · DOI
  152. Fortin, 2000, Randomization tests and spatially autocorrelated data, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81, 201
  153. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04517.x · DOI
  154. 10.5751/ES-00371-060102 · DOI
  155. 10.2307/2261569 · DOI
  156. 10.1023/A:1011905124393 · DOI
  157. 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1509 · DOI
  158. Fortin, M.-J., G. M. Jacquez, G. M. & Shipley, B. (2002). Computer-intense methods. In Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, eds. A. El-Shaarawi & W. W. Piegorsch, pp. 399–402. Chichester: Wiley. (Cited on pages 149, 326)
  159. 10.2307/3212829 · DOI · Paper page
  160. 10.2307/2528833 · DOI
  161. 10.1017/CBO9780511623356 · DOI
  162. Hope, 1968, A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 30, 582, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00759.x · DOI
  163. Penttinen, 1992, Marked point processes in forest statistics, Forest Science, 38, 806, 10.1093/forestscience/38.4.806 · DOI
  164. 10.1007/BF00125131 · DOI
  165. Claramunt, C. & Thériault, M. (1997). Towards semantics for modeling spatio-temporal processes within GIS. In Advances in GIS Research II, eds. M. J. Kraak & M. Molenaar, pp. 47–63. London: Taylor & Francis. (Cited on page 271)
  166. 10.1086/285744 · DOI
  167. 10.2307/1400528 · DOI
  168. 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00023-6 · DOI
  169. 10.2307/2413216 · DOI
  170. Burrough, P. A. (1987). Spatial aspects of ecological data. In Community and Landscape Ecology, eds. R. H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. ter Braak & O. F. R. van Tongeren, pp. 213–51. Nertherlands: Pudoc Wageningen. (Cited on page 11)
  171. Journel, A. G. & Huijbregts, C. (1978). Mining Geostatistics. London: Academia Press. (Cited on pages 29, 132, 137, 146, 160, 165, 166)
  172. 10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00007-9 · DOI
  173. Bailey, T. C. & Gatrell, A. C. (1995). Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical. (Cited on pages 1, 9, 39, 230, 231, 233, 268)
  174. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x · DOI
  175. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1987.tb00120.x · DOI
  176. 10.2307/2258930 · DOI
  177. 10.2307/2997600 · DOI
  178. 10.2307/1938211 · DOI
  179. 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1993.tb00291.x · DOI
  180. 10.1002/bimj.4710370707 · DOI
  181. 10.2307/3235902 · DOI
  182. Diggle, P. J. (1979). Statistical methods for spatial point patterns in ecology. In Spatial and Temporal Analysis in Ecology, eds. R. M. Cormack & J. K. Ord, pp. 95–150. Fairland, MD: International Cooperative Publishing House. (Cited on pages 35, 36)
  183. Ver Hoef, 1989, Multiscale ordination: a method for detecting pattern at several scales, Vegetatio, 82, 59
  184. 10.1139/x99-150 · DOI
  185. 10.2307/2265702 · DOI
  186. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Cited on page 286)
  187. 10.2307/3236000 · DOI
  188. 10.2307/2985220 · DOI
  189. 10.2307/3237191 · DOI
  190. Webster, R. & Oliver, M. (2001). Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. Chichester: Wiley. (Cited on pages 22, 112, 132, 137, 144, 160, 169, 170)
  191. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb04870.x · DOI
  192. 10.1007/BF00540199 · DOI
  193. Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Champagne: Wolfram Media. (Cited on pages 312, 313)
  194. Greig-Smith, P. (1983). Quantitative Plant Ecology, 3rd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Cited on page 88)
  195. Fowler, H. W. & Fowler, F. G. (1976). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, 6th edn, ed. J. B. Sykes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Cited on page 5)
  196. 10.2307/2257231 · DOI
  197. 10.2307/1939419 · DOI
  198. 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00352-2 · DOI
  199. 10.2307/1937698 · DOI
  200. 10.2307/3237221 · DOI

200 of 379 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fortin, M.-J., & Dale, M. R. T.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
2005-04-21
DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511542039
Cited by
991
References
3
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1560 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review