The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validity and the Research Process.
Abstract
Introduction Stage One Validity as Value Stage Two Study Paths and Research Orientations Stage Two Validity as Correspondence Stage Three Validity as Robustness VNS and the Research Process
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research
Maxwell, J. (1992) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826 · Cited by 2,951
Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms
Elo, A.-L., Leppänen, A., & Jahkola, A. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.752 · Cited by 900
Designing experiments that generalize
Highhouse, S. (2009) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107300396 · Cited by 353
Theory as method: small theories of treatments
Lipsey, M. W. (1993) · New Directions for Program Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1637 · Cited by 322
Sample size requirements in structural equation models under standard conditions
Nicolaou, A. I., & Masoner, M. M. (2013) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2013.11.001 · Cited by 67
Theory-oriented software engineering
Stol, K.-J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2015) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.11.010 · Cited by 63
Villanova, P., & Roman, M. A. (1993) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90021-u · Cited by 39
Order effects in belief updating with consistent and inconsistent evidence
Tubbs, R. M., Gaeth, G. J., Levin, I. P., & Van Osdol, L. A. (1993) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960060404 · Cited by 38
Boulay, S. (2012) · Revue internationale de communication sociale et publique · doi:10.4000/communiquer.487 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Higgins, J., Brunberg, D., & McGrath, J. E.
- Venue
- The Statistician
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403
- ISSN
- 0039-0526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060239460
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
