The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effectiveness of Condoms in Reducing Heterosexual Transmission of HIV
Abstract
CONTEXT: It is not established whether the condom is as effective at preventing heterosexual transmission of HIV as it is for preventing conception. An overall estimate of condom effectiveness for HIV prevention is needed. METHODS: Information on condom usage and HIV serology was obtained from 25 published studies of serodiscordant heterosexual couples. Condom usage was classified as always (in 100% of acts of intercourse), sometimes (1-99%, 0-99% or 1-100%) or never (0%). Studies were stratified by design, direction of transmission and condom usage group. Condom efficacy was calculated from the HIV transmission rates for always-users and never-users. RESULTS: For always-users, 12 cohort samples yielded a consistent HIV incidence of 0.9 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.8). For 11 cohort samples of never-users, incidence was estimated at 6.8 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval, 4.4-10.1) for male-to-female transmission, 5.9 per 100 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-15.1) for female-to-male transmission and 6.7 per 100 (95% confidence interval, 4.5-9.6) in samples that specified the direction of transmission. Generally, the condom's effectiveness at preventing HIV transmission is estimated to be 87%, but it may be as low as 60% or as high as 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent use of condoms provides protection from HIV. The level of protection approximates 87%, with a range depending upon the incidence among condom nonusers. Thus, the condom's efficacy at reducing heterosexual transmission may be comparable to or slightly lower than its effectiveness at preventing pregnancy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Cited by
The epidemiology of human papillomavirus infections
Baseman, J. G., & Koutsky, L. A. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Virology · doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2004.12.008 · Cited by 955
Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission.
Weller, S. C., & Davis-Beaty, K. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003255 · Cited by 846
Self-citationMANHART, L. E., & KOUTSKY, L. A. (2002) · Sexually Transmitted Diseases · doi:10.1097/00007435-200211000-00018 · Cited by 381
Men's influences on women's reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives
Dudgeon, M. R., & Inhorn, M. C. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.035 · Cited by 377
To Be Seen and Not Heard: Femininity Ideology and Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Health
Impett, E. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, K. R., & Weller, S. C.
- Venue
- Family Planning Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 272
- ISSN
- 0014-7354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W120530849
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effectiveness of Condoms in Reducing Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2991537
- The paper
- Davis, K. R., & Weller, S. C. (1999). The Effectiveness of Condoms in Reducing Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. Family Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.