The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are All Contraceptive Failures Unintended Pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth
Abstract
CONTEXT: The incidence of unintended pregnancy has long been used as a primary indicator of the state of reproductive health. However, the definition--and therefore the measurement--of this indicator has been elusive. METHODS: Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) were used to compare levels of unintended pregnancy among contraceptive users based on two definitions--the standard definition based on women's reports of contraceptive failure, and the NSFG definition based on pregnancy timing (wanted then, wanted later, or not wanted then or in the future). An attitudinal scale was used to examine women's feelings about their unintended pregnancy. RESULTS: Of pregnancies classified as contraceptive failures under the standard definition, only 68% were unintended pregnancies--94% of those ending in abortion and 60% of those ending in birth. Just 59% of women with a contraceptive failure classified as an unintended pregnancy reported feeling unhappy or very unhappy about their pregnancy, while 90% of those with a failure classified as an intended pregnancy reported being happy or very happy. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of wantedness based on women's feelings about their pregnancy may correlate more closely with important pregnancy outcomes than do traditional measures of intendedness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · PubMed · doi:10.1363/psrh.38.090.06 · Cited by 585
Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy
Barrett, G., Smith, S. C., & Wellings, K. (2004) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.014787 · Cited by 373
Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression
Wilson, M. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20318 · Cited by 329
Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter?
Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B. (2012) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.26.2.141 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Trussell, J., Vaughan, B., & Stanford, J.
- Venue
- Family Planning Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 246
- ISSN
- 0014-7354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2285034756
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are All Contraceptive Failures Unintended Pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2991573
- The paper
- Trussell, J., Vaughan, B., & Stanford, J. (1999). Are All Contraceptive Failures Unintended Pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.