The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of Pregnancy Planning Status on Birth Outcomes and Infant Care
Abstract
CONTEXT: The planning status of a pregnancy may affect a woman's prenatal behaviors and the health of her newborn. However, whether this effect is independent or is attributable to socioeconomic and demographic factors has not been explored using nationally representative data. METHODS: Data were obtained on 9,122 births reported in the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and 2,548 births reported in the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth. Multiple logistic regression analyses were employed to examine the effects of planning status on the odds of a negative birth outcome (premature delivery, low-birth-weight infant or infant who is small for gestational age), early well-baby care and breastfeeding. RESULTS: The proportion of infants born with a health disadvantage is significantly lower if the pregnancy was intended than if it was mistimed or not wanted; the proportions who receive well-baby care by age three months and who are ever breastfed are highest if the pregnancy was intended. In analyses controlling for the mother's background characteristics, however, a mistimed pregnancy has no significant effect on any of these outcomes. An unwanted pregnancy increases the likelihood that the infant's health will be compromised (odds ratio, 1.3), but the association is no longer significant when the mother's prenatal behaviors are also taken into account. Unwanted pregnancy has no independent effect on the likelihood of well-baby care, but it reduces the odds of breastfeeding (0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the planning status of a pregnancy can help identify women who may need support to engage in prenatal behaviors that are associated with healthy outcomes and appropriate infant care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Disparities in family planning
Dehlendorf, C., Rodriguez, M. I., Levy, K., Borrero, S., & Steinauer, J. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022 · Cited by 414
Intention to Become Pregnant and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review
Shah, P. S., Balkhair, T., Ohlsson, A., Beyene, J., Scott, F., & Frick, C. (2011) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2 · Cited by 342
Foster, D. G., Biggs, M. A., Raifman, S., Gipson, J., Kimport, K., & Rocca, C. H. (2018) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785 · Cited by 127
Afshar, Y., Mei, J. Y., Gregory, K. D., Kilpatrick, S. J., & Esakoff, T. F. (2018) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12320 · Cited by 64
(2011) · PubMed · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Kost, K., Landry, D. J., & Darroch, J. E.
- Venue
- Family Planning Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 223
- ISSN
- 0014-7354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111387073
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Pregnancy Planning Status on Birth Outcomes and Infant Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2991608
- The paper
- Kost, K., Landry, D. J., & Darroch, J. E. (1998). The Effects of Pregnancy Planning Status on Birth Outcomes and Infant Care. Family Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.