The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teenage Partners' Communication About Sexual Risk and Condom Use: The Importance of Parent-Teenager Discussions
Abstract
CONTEXT: Teenagers' communication with their partners about sex and their use of condoms may be influenced by the discussions teenagers have with their parents about sex. However, little is known about the process of parent-teenager communication on this topic. Understanding both what parents discuss with their children and how they discuss it may lead to a greater understanding of teenagers' sexual behavior. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 372 sexually active black and Hispanic youth aged 14-17 from Alabama, New York and Puerto Rico. Regression analyses were used to examine parent-teenager discussions about sexuality and about sexual risk, and parental communication skills as predictors of teenagers' discussions about sexual risk with a partner and teenagers' condom use. RESULTS: Parent-teenager discussions about sexuality and sexual risk were associated with an increased likelihood of teenager-partner discussions about sexual risk and of teenagers' condom use, but only if parents were open, skilled and comfortable in having those discussions. Teenagers' communication with their partner about sexual risk also was associated with greater condom use, but the relationship between parent-teenager communication and teenagers' condom use was independent of this association. CONCLUSIONS: The influence on teenagers of parent-teenager discussions about sexuality and sexual risk depends on both what parents say and how they say it. Programs that foster parent-teenager communication about sexuality and sexual risk must emphasize both of these aspects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parent and Peer Communication Effects on AIDS-Related Behavior Among U.S. High School Students
Holtzman, D., & Rubinson, R. (1995) · Family Planning Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2136175 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: a research synthesis
Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. A. (2001) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0513 · Cited by 568
Parent-Adolescent Sexual Communication and Adolescent Safer Sex Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Noar, S. M., Nesi, J., & Garrett, K. (2016) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2731 · Cited by 474
Whitaker, D. J., & Miller, K. S. (2000) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/0743558400152004 · Cited by 469
Self-citationConnectedness as a Predictor of Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes for Youth
Markham, C. M., Lormand, D., Gloppen, K. M., Peskin, M. F., Flores, B., Low, B., & House, L. D. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.11.214 · Cited by 444
Parent-adolescent communication about sex and birth control: A conceptual framework
Jaccard, J., Dodge, T., & Dittus, P. (2002) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.48 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitaker, D. J., Miller, K. S., May, D. C., & Levin, M. L.
- Venue
- Family Planning Perspectives
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 117
- ISSN
- 0014-7354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141153735
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teenage Partners' Communication About Sexual Risk and Condom Use: The Importance of Parent-Teenager Discussions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2991693
- The paper
- Whitaker, D. J., Miller, K. S., May, D. C., & Levin, M. L. (1999). Teenage Partners' Communication About Sexual Risk and Condom Use: The Importance of Parent-Teenager Discussions. Family Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.