Cited by 568Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsReproductive Health and Contraception

Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: a research synthesis

Miller, Brent C., Benson, Brad, Galbraith, Kevin A.·2001·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/drev.2000.0513

Cites

200 of 200 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003510241
Cited by
568
References
200
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 45
FWCI
29.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
adolescent pregnancy, family influence, parental supervision, parent-child closeness, neighborhood disorganization, single-parent families, sexual abuse, pubertal timing, adolescent sexual intercourse, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review